Serie De Nero 6.6.0.1.3

Some comments on the unity of secular

The baby National Coordination Lay is a very timely initiative in our country, it faced the overwhelming power of the Church must join forces and speak with one voice to emerge, there is no alternative to ' units of the laity. An initiative that can be effective, it also shows some broken clerical reaction.

parallel to worthy initiatives to mobilize the Coordination of individual or groups of individuals, often in the area, however, it also calls for reflection (and subsequent comparison) about where-and how-to channel the energies, which are initiatives that can be shared, what are the immediate priorities but also on how the initiative over the long term, being at large in our country a widespread awareness of secular, liberal and genuinely democratic bone in many countries outside Europe (eg to secular demonstrations held in the very Catholic Spain but also in Turkey and recently in Tunisia and Lebanon ) already exists here and that we must build from the ground up, and this is a job that inevitably will touch us. In fact, it is useless to turn to politics, we know that secularism is not on the agenda of any party, except occasionally and only for periodic and temporary expediency, we know that secularism does not 'pay' in terms of electoral support for the bulk of the population actually do not even know the meaning of secularism, or trust the description given by the pope when it appears on the balcony on Sunday. As we know that a significant proportion of citizens form opinions based solely on information "official", especially television news.

A hypothetical party exclusively devoted to the cause of secularism (atheism or worse), then, would not have sufficient visibility in the media controlled by the power of pro-Vatican, and would provide security to the bulk of the electorate, which is rightly sensitive to all the unresolved problems of our Italy and not just some. Instead, we constitute ourselves as a lobby, a lobby equal and opposite to that of the Catholics, and put our votes on the package of market policy.

Therefore, we can begin immediately by Laura Balbo bell'intervento of the Meeting "free not to believe" organized by the EU in September 2009: "We who are here," says sociologist and honorary president of ' Uaar "we are already aware, but how to reach the other ?. In fact, this is the core of the problem: the ideal-that does not seem to get is a chance-interest and involve the same masses who are currently willing to crowd the streets in protest against the "bunga bunga 'or against the continued attacks on the dignity of work and school, because the problems (lack of) secular state are not less important, but we are the only ones who realize it and do not need to none that we continue to remain a small and isolated 'cultural elite' aware, unless we are able to affect the rest of the country. ____________________________________________


As the battle is also fought on the ground of media (yes, those same media who regularly cry censorship but then an infinitesimal space to devote to issues of secularism, even if they involve a significant proportion of citizens ) in a country that has more the appearance of being, it is important that we see, maybe even that we count, in fact they can no longer ignore us, so a good communication campaign (not necessarily mere advertising, which of course has its costs ) would be important, but in the case will be 'outdated' s ateobus : useless to discuss theology or maximum systems (there is a God / god is not there), rather than make clear that non-believers are not free as believers, and that this is not right because it is one that others are taxpaying citizens alike, and it 's time that everyone knows. Even

clarity of language is important: we know that the Church clergy and politicians and pundits use the proven system of obsessive repetition of a lie until it becomes a matter of truth or fact. They talk, for example, the family as if it were an abstract entity or a solid block, but no more alien to the everyday reality for all, as if the ruin of one family on millions and millions in the whole world was the institution of the family-block only to be compromised. We must be able to explain the truth in a clear, unequivocal and convincing, for example, using the metaphor of the chair, talking about the extension of the institution and civil-secular, not religious-of marriage to homosexual couples, it may demonstrate that it is not to lift one leg to the chair (the institution of family), which certainly falls in that way, but it comes to talking to another chair, to complement and not replace the existing one. In short, we must be able to explain convincingly that giving rights to those who do not take away from those who in no way implies it already has.

also why it is important that the membership will increase the CLN, and involve movements (eg a ) and associations including those not normally vote to the cause of secularism, it is important to put together the mobilization capacity of individual organizations (such as just see how the little-known We Breccia has been able-in 'general indifference of the media-to take place in something like five thousand people around, even with a platform "aggressive" as the No-Vat), and it is important conivolgere also known people who do more "listening" to the world of communication and increase our market value of the policy and the same communication, two things that often coincide. Not shocked that this logic "merchant", if it helps achieve the goal.

Again, as is already the ' Uaar , close to the elections compile a list of candidates with your back straight, available to represent our concerns if elected, list to be run for the web, or send letters to newspapers signed directly by the CLN (associations are generally considered more of individuals) to enter into the debate on secularism-as-you also our point of view otherwise spent on the sly . They are all solutions to almost zero cost, who has other ideas come forward.

_______________________________________________

In short, it is essential to create a movement of opinion COESO well VISIBLE , which is manifested in its compact and forceful when needed. So there might be reverse process to that of today: will the parties (or individual politicians, some of which is already the case) to come and offer their availability to represent us in Parliament, this will mean a little haggling, but a virtue of necessity. Visibility is what we need to begin with, and we can go through the process that began with the CLN.

Besides the time seems propitious, with the Church pedophilia scandal in difficulty, the decline in revenue from eight per thousand and the increasingly embarrassing unconditional support for the paradoxical defender of 'Christian values' Berlusconi beat until the wire is is hot. Maybe we've already missed the boat of the upcoming elections, which all take for upcoming, but at least for the time of the next term we need to prepare and build something solid.

________________________________________________________

Finally, last but not least , you also need a humble self-criticism and constructive for the suicidal tendency to fragmentation and multiplication of the initiatives of associations, an attitude sometimes perhaps due to pure narcissism and producing guilty dispersion of energy, you will understand what we are willing to give for example in terms of visibility for the benefit of individual collegiate initiative, agreed with the other secular reality. In short, the individual will actually cede some autonomy decision (which can remain independent for the rest) to CLN on topics of general interest, to give it the necessary authority and agility that is essential. In order to avoid useless, for the umpteenth time.

This is the "homework" that we could all play in the coming months.


version published in 'synthetic' here .

Pap Tests Shave Before

The Higgs boson in the dissemination of newspapers

From "Corriere della sera" 21/12/2010

The Higgs. Carneades, who was he? The mass of people do not know and rightly so. But the newspapers, they, yes, they know and according to their informative news and this same truth from time to time, in correspondence with the experiments at CERN and write sensational headlines, like "the hunt for the Higgs, or the God particle ". God particle not in the sense of a possessive genitive, as created by God, but in the subjective sense, as it is the particle that creates God, that is to say that 'the origin of matter, with the implication sorridevole, alluring and sensational which means "read with care, be careful, soon we will share the extraordinary news that God does not exist, because all 'source c' is the Higgs particle that gives matter at all."

Higgs explained that the term comes from the name of the Indian physicist Satyendra Nath Bose who has studied elementary particles, which are divided into bosons and fermions. The physical Higgs in 1964, while strolling on the Scottish hills said to have had a great idea (one big idea ), suggested the 'existence of a new elementary particle, that at all today', has not yet been detected in experiments particle acceleration, but that is sought with great dedication by the huge superacceleratore LHC in Geneva. Recent experiments (October 2010) have begun to give important results are on track, but not decisive in determining the existence of irrefutable Higgs. The large machine was switched off December 6, 2010 for a two-month maintenance and upgrade of technology used. The energy level reached by which we tried the Higgs boson was 7 Tev (a Tev is equivalent to one million electron volts). When will rekindle enough, perhaps, bring it to 7.1 Tev to get many other great results. But if they are not, the car can climb to power Maximum of 14 TeV. In all this, the 600 Italian physicists, the world's most important in the field of high energies, have a significance both in record-breaking 'invention of technologies in both the design and direction. At the head of the four experiments, involving about 6000 scientists from around the world, are all Italian physicists. Their purpose is to reproduce the conditions of 'universe a split second after the big bang from which everything originates. This is beautiful, great and positive perspective. But beauty is not what made the 'editor of a text on the physical Higgs Leon Max Lederman. This Nobel Prize winner spoke of "goddamn particle" for his elusive character, the elusive search tools. All 'publisher did not like the name, which changed to the "God particle", thus giving the' start to the sensationalism of the newspapers. Higgs was concerned that this might offend religious people and was disappointed. For newspapers and instead is left with enthusiasm "the God particle." But is the purpose of the CERN scientists have finally confirmed the Higgs boson certainly do not offend religious people. They know and just with the scientific findings which science operates and can operate only in 'immanent, and that no scientific discovery as Galileo thought the believer can never undermine the transcendent. There are different orders and any negative inference, each application of finite categories to 'infinite transcendence is not possible. Higgs can sleep soundly without fear of offending someone.

What Has Happen To Nick Berry

E 'nato a secular atheist child

GROUPS APPEAL TO ITALIAN

On 29 January, Modena, has run together a group of Italian associations, decided to take a step towards the unity of secular forces, often missing. The desire to join

stems from the fact that, like it or not, we face great challenges. Challenges raised against the secular nature of institutions, attacked on every front and on every issue: from the principle of the bioassay autoderminazione by Law 194 to assisted reproduction, the use of contraceptives, the pill RU486, the necessary reform of family law in defense of schools of the Republic. And many others could be added.

Although the lay Italian association experiences a moment of historical weakness - and nobody needs hide - no doubt Italy is in many ways, a largely secular society, as evidenced by several statistics. Each subject lay in fact, the Italian and the Italians showed an independence of opinion by religious dogma and the statements of the parties that bodes well for the present and the future.

The vast majority of secular people are our strength and we wish them and all over the country and we need to talk. Of course to defend the rights gained, but also to extend them.

Moving from defense to the proposal, it is our intention, as advancing only defends what is already acquired.

We therefore decided to test us, in a practical and sincere. We believe that the urgency is more relevant today and this in 2011, oppose the passage of legislation against the freedom-based bioassays, which violates the constitutional right to self-therapeutic, enshrined in Article 32 and confirmed by the international conventions signed by ' Italy. On this issue concrete measure our desire for unity of secular forces. If, as we hope, the outcome is positive, then we will have a new tool to intervene on all issues concerning the rights, individual and civil rights.

For these reasons, we invite all Italian associations that recognize the principle of secularism to join the LAY NATIONAL COORDINATION .

Cinzia Cecconi Maurizio Gori
spokesmen

Nicotine Patch Blister

manga studio

first round brush manga studio debut
.. the result is not 'na
great thing, however, the program makes appalladefogo!

Heat Pump Aux Light Hook Up

Air Spring

Main Event Boxing Gloves

All Nintendo Events Coming Up

A bit pattern of nature 'of clarity

reviving the study of mathematics, physics, philosophy that we did not evil is a return to some 'clarity on the concepts of finite and infinite, as frequently in the press, returns to the question whether the' universe is finite or infinite.

Let's start close to us. L 'experience tells us that a part is equal (in terms equipotent specialist) to everything, and everything in our experiential world is over. This is a first clear, easy to conquer, because it's part of what we experience. That part was equal to all, as leading to say the solution of certain problems, it was impossible problem posed by the disciple of Galileo, Bonaventura Cavalieri. But the logic of mathematics, Galileo already solve the problem, discovered that the part is equal to the whole. Infinite sets in the part is equal to the whole. So the mathematical logic wins the 'infinite. For the mathematical logic' exists and there is infinite because his mental costruzone does not lead to any contradictions. Therefore a first response now sure the 'we have: the' infinite exists. Thanks to mathematical logic we could do some 'clarity. Now we can use the language property. So when we talk about finite and infinite we can and must be accurate to say we refer to as infinity. The 'infinity exists in mathematical logic as God exists in mathematical logic. He has proved his theorem by Kurt Godel. But we are at the same problem: the 'infinity of mathematical logic is not the' absolute infinite. On this level the party is not really equal to the whole. No calculation of logic, no scientific discovery can never make the leap from 'immanent to the transcendent. The 'infinity of infinite sets is not the' absolute infinity which is breathed totaliter . Therefore, even the most advanced scientific discoveries at the borders and beyond our universe can not refer more than the 'immanent. Experimental science, the discoveries have every right to tell us that the 'universe is finite, because they operate only in' immanent. The scientist, a modern Ulysses, passing all the Hercules 'columns, and can only just discovered the' immanent without being able to deny the transcendent. The 'infinite absolute tutt' other history of all 'others for which only in retrospect, philosophically, we may think.

How Long For Std Test Results

A contribution to the Courtyard of the Gentiles

Tomorrow, February 12, will finally be opened in Bologna called the Courtyard of the Gentiles, which was announced several times by Msgr. Gianfranco Ravasi: the intent of the founding of the latter (which takes its name from the court that existed in the temple of Jerusalem where the people were "other" than elected) should be a space in which the Catholic Church is confronted with non- believers.

Judging by recent statements by influential members of the Catholic clergy and specifically of who was involved in the preparation of the event ( here a selection of 'pearls' ecclesial and clerical thread about atheists and atheism, and the sources of the quotations in this article), however, the initiative has the air to be a sort of debate make-up, plus a spectacular event that a true propaganda-peer comparison: in fact the Church, more and more worried by the advance of relativism and secularism of Western society, is committed tirelessly in 'recruitment campaign' with little risk as possible, and Bologna for the conference has been chosen with care stakeholders, fishing mostly in secure fence so-called "devout atheists" (not will first Massimo Cacciari, who is one of the most authoritative exponents, while we know nothing about the participation by Marcello Pera, who understands the pope for having collaborated several times with him) rather than in the secular world of associations and atheists and agnostics, to arrive at the summit to define the contempt UAAR (actually the largest and most influential membership atheist Italian) "folk" gimmick that is most likely to avoid a confrontation is not tamed.

A comparison of peer-l 'can-only assumes knowledge and mutual respect, and should be done only when citizens and non-believers and believers will have the same level of civil rights and individual liberties, a situation far removed to be carried out in some European democracies, including our country first.

But we give credit to Msgr. Ravasi and his staff, pending the outcome of the event and sincerely hope that what will come out first of all is the end of the denial of the existence of atheists (and atheism), the refund to them the full dignity of every human person deserves beyond their beliefs, and even the official declaration of the end of hostilities against Catholic atheists and interference in lawmaking by national parliaments. We believe at this point On this occasion we want to make our modest contribution to the debate in the form of a list of essential (to Nick Hornby), briefly and in short order, of what was essential was finally taken and placed at the base of the debate, from Bologna onwards: 1

atheism is not a danger to society and the Church, and is not threatening to the point of having the ability - and intentions - to destroy one or the other or "disfigured man and creation," as feared by Camillo Ruini in an interview with Corriere del 2 December 2009 by Pope Ratzinger and the hearing to the diplomatic corps accredited to the Holy See January 12, 2010;

2 is not true that atheists are in favor of eugenics and of scientism outright regardless, maybe raised to think like religious, even an atheist has his own spirituality and love for the 'life', which ignore religion;

3 we can not say that atheists do not know God 'are not fully human' (Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor interviewed by the BBC in May 2009), or who are unable to grasp the 'humanity and love of neighbor, as he elegantly suggested Mr. Ratzinger in person at the General Audience of December 2, 2009 and in the homily of January 2, 2010;

4 can not be said that there atheism, or that it is impossible to be an atheist, or simply that atheism is the "rejection" of the existence of God, because this assumes that the existence of god is real and proven. E 'instead start from the well for which some claim that there is anything that has to try it, not those who deny it, which even then would have the burden of proof of non existence, a paradox unacceptable

5 is not true that atheists have no type of morality, or which are-according to the common misconception-beings without inhibitions and lack of respect for this neighbor, devoted to all kinds of criminal brutality, at best, that their life has no "direction, a purpose '(always Ruini, in the interview above), it is not true that atheists, by failing to a deity as a reference, rely on surrogates such as astrology or vices such as gambling, or create other types of idols, as if it must necessarily fill a void. Participants in the Courtyard of the Gentiles should take note of reality to understand it: there is no single ethical and moral one, the Christian is not the only possible and is not a priori be considered the best ever, and a man can achieve peacefully their aspirations even without a god on the horizon;

6 atheists do not share responsibility for the massacres committed by dictatorships "materialistic" of the twentieth century, with which atheism has no relevance: it is commonly cite Stalin, Hitler (Speech Ratzinger during his visit to Britain, September 2010) and Fidel Castro (though it leaves out - who knows why - Augusto Pinochet);

7 atheism is not a dogmatic ideology . There are actually many forms of atheism as there are atheists. Relativism feared by the Church is not negative in itself, but rather a resource that enriches and increases both individual companies in a variety of successful approaches to reality, while still ensuring the existence of religious ideologies;

8 do not need (heaven forbid) an 'alliance between monotheistic ' defeat ' atheism, as advocated by the Minister Foreign Affairs Franco Frattini in an article for L'Osservatore Romano, October 22, 2010, which sounds almost like an incitement to persecution of atheists, we also face a lot of attention to the use of biblical quotations, it is not prudent for example, that the Pope, at this time of witch hunts, stressing that there is need for the "stick and crook, to ward off wild animals from the herd" (celebration Eucharistic June 12, 2010);

And good job to all the defendants in the Courtyard.

Vintage Girdles And Stockings

Occam's razor

Occam's razor, postulated by the English monaco William of Occam in the fourteenth century, is a methodological principle according to which the same elements of the solution to a problem that is simpler or more reasonable or it is useless to complicate the solution of a problem by adding more complex assumptions than necessary.

The principle was not accepted uncritically by the whole world of philosophy and science, for example, there is those who oppose it arguing that its staff is the refusal or inability to accept an uncomfortable reality, or the complexities of nature in its entirety, and this criticism is good to see you for even the basics of creation: it is very easy to understand (and easy to accept, because it requires no effort or research reason) an explanation of the existence of all its complexity and with the help of an agent whose creator's original intentions and its origin is unknown (but should be accepted without criticism), but in reality this does nothing but move the problem up one step higher: Who created the creator? If the logic was part of the cultural heritage of religions, the principle address the problem in a flash.

Occam's razor, for which he saw his postulate is accused of heresy by the Church of Pope John XXII, is applicable in a variety of situations ranging from small daily problems to the great question of the existence of the transcendent, but in fact the principle also applies to the world of scientific research, for example in the dispute over the composition of the universe and the laws that govern it: the existence of dark matter (or 'dark matter' theory backed up by some comments but not yet definitively proven) is not 'is no unanimity in the scientific community, and to explain the movement of the largest cosmic structures, ie galaxies and clusters of galaxies, a minority This has theorized that Newtonian physics might have different laws depending on the cosmic scale investigating, this theory called MOND (modified Newtonian Dynamic) seems an unnecessary complication to the more in light of the existence of dark matter, or-changing point of view-it is pointless to the latter theory. The debate is still open, although it seems they go to great strides towards proving the existence of dark matter.

in Robert Zemeckis' Contact of 1997 (adapted from a novel by Carl Sagan) is an excellent application of the principle in both fields, the scientific and theological. The two protagonists are a theologian who has great influence the White House and a research scientist of SETI (Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence, finding extraterrestrial intelligence, a program that really does exist): the first, of course, can not explain the existence of god with evidence, not the second may prove his contact with an alien civilization evolved because his instruments have not made anything.

A lesson to be learned from all this is that it is good to deal with research in all fields of human knowledge with humility and without arrogance, and that we must always be ready to challenge their case, without making a matter of unquestionable principles.

Already published here .

Can I Use Neufchatel Instead Of Cream Cheese

The leadership of' arts

The power of beauty!

Bulldog Remote Car Start Device

Crosses in the mountains, or how to mark the territory of the method

among readers who loves and frequents the mountain will not have been able to avoid notice that the peaks above our valleys svettino many Christian crosses, placed to dominate the valleys below, or hidden, locations visible only after a long and arduous journey along the paths of high altitude. Iron, concrete or wood, more or less visible but still intrusive, 'artificial', clearly a symbol of a party to the mountain-that-place (even if it were considered that arises from the natural movement of continental plates) work is not aware of upper holder of the symbol but, besides being of everyone, believers or not, however, is the place 'spiritual' or metaphysical par excellence

"Every visitor to the mountain, past and present Motivated by intent or wilderness recreation and leisure, found in the upstream core value in many ways a mystic, resulting primarily from the inevitable, majestic natural beauty of the mountains, from being a sphere of purity, still devoid of incontaminatezza certain ugliness of human civilization more senseless, from every place absolute peak, high above the world and beyond which there is only the vastness of the sky; the same plan from the climber ascending to the summit has often been interpreted in ascetic (same etymological root, for that matter), the elevation from the daily routine to that of pure high altitudes. Without in any way stretch out to supernatural visions, divine and thus religious, there is no doubt that the essence of the mountain vibrates and touches the deepest chords of the human soul, and springs from feelings and emotions of absolute humanity, someone called the mountains " cathedrals of the earth ", to emphasize a sacred absolute, absolutely secular and well contrasted with any other set of religious origin, with the mountains as beautiful temples praising the beauty of nature in general and of our world, "

to use the words of the writer Luca Rota .

habit to 'mark' territory, as some wild animals with their smell, is typical Catholic culture dates back to ancient times, but those times have changed and the imposition of party symbols is no longer universally advocated or tolerated only by those who make the mountain even his 'profession' or his life: the question In fact, it was also placed inside the CAI, the Italian Alpine Club, and the debate has reached peaks that would drive controversy, for example, some members to return the card without many regrets, while a Swiss mountain guide has a cross sawn without ceremony or remorse, and even here in some crosses planted with emphasis (and with the helicopter) Dolomites 'disappear' mysteriously, leaving only the holes of the bolts between the shock of innocent villagers. It comes, inevitably, to the provocation of some intelligent guides who in 2005 brought a statue of Buddha on top of Pizzo shovel. About

plant crosses in the mountains is not even remotely consider that his abuse is, an arbitrary act, misappropriation of a common good, as does (fortunately only in words) the reigning pope, and as did his predecessor, who during his summer holidays in Val d'Aosta, which does not glorify God's work that it would create 'such great beauty'. It 'true that a cross between a ski lift, which is abandoned or running, there is little doubt which creates the most damage to the alpine environment (Ratzinger has never been to see Pila summer?), But apart from the fact that a battle does not exclude the other, a chair lift is not a symbol of an ideology (if not that of cement and speculators at all costs) for discriminating those who do not share.

To all these objections to replicate it ends with the usual self-destructive mechanism (involuntary?) Scaling the value of the symbol-crucifix: a cross that annoying?, respond after trying to argue the alleged universality of the symbol.
So you can not give that right to Reinhold Messner, when he says that would be fair to remove all symbols from the mountains: "When you reach the top as they used to do just once, to build a cairn of stones." And stop. In order not to make religious war territory of yet.




Already published here .

Fast Std Test In Toronto

L 'existence of God

Background with the 'help of the great physicist Antonino Zichichi : What does it mean

Existence , Exist?

" Existence in Physics means: space time, mass, energy and basic charges "(A. Zichichi, Because I believe in the One who made the world between faith and science , Basic Books, New, p. 132)

Question: el 'act of thinking (soul) is not there? No, Zichichi is right. The 'act of thinking is not mere existence, is to live. Living implies' existence, but not vice versa.

" Existence, in Matenatica, it means no contradiction "(A. Zichichi, ibid, p. 135)

theorem 'incompleteness of the 1931 Kurt Godel: Kurt Godel showed that" is not true that a logical construction would necessarily lead to a conclusion or its negation. E 'come out as strictly logical conclusion: it is impossible to decide " (A. Zichichi, ibdem, p. 137)

" If the logical rigor is not enough to get to prove a theorem, as can claim that the logical rigor - in the 'Immanent - can never lead to the proof of Theorem Supreme, namely the' existence of God? "(A. Zichichi, ibid, p. 138)

NB.: Do not forget that mathematics, mathematical logic, the numbers are Immanent.

" in the transcendent, what ever it means to exist? Where we could never imagine heaven? Certainly neither the
spaces or not in time nor in the mass either in 'energy or in the office or in the logical rigor of mathematics.
would be like putting a 'supreme and absolute entity under the control of those laws that we know ...
That 's the only answer to' existence of the transcendent and the 'Act of Faith "( A. Zichichi, ibid. 143-144).
That is to say that' can not demonstrate the immanent transcendent, can not bridge the gap between the two, can not make the leap and go beyond.

Quote from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gödel 's_ontological_proof

Theorem Gödel : Yet Gödel, mathematician, pure logic, philosophy of mathematics, he describes himself as a theist, not surrender to develop a theorem that proves the 'existence of God, understood as a body that includes all the positive properties, including 'existence.

An institution that combines all these qualities is not logically possible that it has not even a real existence. And so it goes from GODEL logical plan that is not factual because salvaguardarebbe consistency of logical discourse (= non-contradiction) if the supposition that the 'existence of God Godel, Plato, believed that mathematical truth, logic, and objective, ontological and not merely an elaboration of 'intellect. Therefore, the demonstration of 'existence of God can have a metaphysical existence, ontological as he conceives it. Even if it was by the experts of modal logic in the theorem belongs to the 'ontological existence of God is not just logical, it remains possible to think that' existence of God in the formal system of logic, coherent or consistent, as in it does not contain contradiction, does not prove anything to the 'existence of God in the Transcendent. Do not exceed the jump. Journalistically c 'is the writer, in effect, that Gödel proved the' existence of God The transition from 'immanent to the transcendent is appealing, but it is not legitimate. Philosophically it is begging, because we need to demonstrate the principle that we need instead to prove. Not enough consistency or logical consistency (= non-contradiction): This ensures the 'existence to' internal system of formal logic, in 'immanent, but you can not make the leap to the transcendent. The demonstration, which is composed of three definitions, six axioms, a theorem first with two other theorems and a corollary is essentially equivalent to an a priori proof. His proof, assuming that it is valid (the experts cast doubt on sharply above the second axiom), is a demonstration only logic of 'God's existence, however we must remember that the truth, Plato, is not equal to provability. This knows also the most advanced science, so the non provability of transcendence can be seen as its non-existence of many natural truths, and today perhaps never, does not, you can not deduct their non-existence sic et simpliciter.

also philosophical proofs (which are not evidence and it would be best to call way), do not get better results, both a priori and a posteriori ones. The tests do not depend on a priori 'experience, information from the outside world, but only by reason, subsequent tests rely on experiential information. Anselmo d 'Aosta wants to prove the' existence of God only in a logical manner. Therefore, its test is not ontological, as has become custom to say that Kant on, but logical. The test provides in Chapter Two of Proslogion . Here are the steps. For Anselmo d 'Aosta is God:

"What we can not think of anything more" (aliquid quo nihil maius cogitari possit).

"What we can not think of anything more "can not be only in the intellect.

If it was only in the intellect, you'd think something that was also exists in reality and that something would be greater than something existing only in the intellect."

If "what we can not think of anything more" was only in the intellect, "what we can not think nothing more "would be" what we think is the greater. And this is a contradiction. "Therefore God exists.

Quote from: # top http://www.maat.it/livello2/anselmo-01.htm

L 'Abbe Gaunilone preclude serious objections to this topic. Do not just think of an 'island full of delight, for there. Anselmo d' Aosta argues that the 'example is not accurate, because it is not ontological. L' island is not the greatest thing you can think . It has a limited perfection, God is all perfection. Gaunilone emphasizes that it is not legitimate the transition from the conceptual level of the proof, the actual ontological existence. This is the weak point and not a priori demonstration of the test. It 's the weak point of all tests in advance. It 's also the weak point of Godel's theorem, if they actually mean, as seems to move from plan to plan logical mathematical ontology.

Thomas Aquinas 'thought unfounded a priori proof of Anselmo d' Aosta. In the Summa Contra Gentiles writes: "Among the atheist is not known to all that He is bigger than you might think," and directs all subsequent tests, it is best to call and routes that can be summarized as follows:

• Ex Motu (ie, "the motion" that moves everything requires a cause first because, as Aristotle teaches, "You can not go to infinity in the search for causes)
• Ex Case (ie" the cause "every effect needs a cause, the need of a first cause uncaused )
• Ex quotas (ie, "the quota" for all things exist, but may not exist, did not in itself the reason for their existence and, therefore, be necessary to refer to a)
• Ex Gradu (ie "the degree" things have different degrees of perfection, but only a maximum degree perfection enables the intermediate stages)
• Ex Fine (meaning "the end" all things in the universe are ranked according to a purpose, then, there must be an intelligence that orders them so ) ;

Quote from: http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommaso_d% 27Aquino

Even these are not evidence, but ways in which you can get a conviction, a reasoned conviction of the 'idea of' Idea deduced from the existence of God and quae facta sunt , not a priori or innate.

Małgorzata Zięba Pyskowice

To search for the truth

Four important rules of the Cartesian method based on the reason for seeking the truth:

• evidence: "Never accept anything as true that I do not accept it for evidence"
• analysis "draw each share of difficulties to solve them ... I looked better
• synthesis : start "the most commonplace objects simpler and easier to understand "the way back to the knowledge of the most complex"
• enumeration : retrace the truth known to reconstruct the chain of links.

Prom Suits Description

The total nonchalance of' the beautiful art

Triumph of Beauty!

Heartburn White Tongue

Area and the positive!

The bad and the bad, in society and culture of the twentieth century and in this first decade of the third millennium, have so space that there does not seem to be more beautiful and positive. The reason was that were marred by tragic events. Yet not everything was bad and negative. Indeed, there were also immense positive things which we enjoy today. But the bad and the negative was affected so deeply that so far it seems that we can not talk, discuss, create, produce no pessimism, no vitriol, no nihilism and relativism without no representations guided by the ugly and negative. We think of the expressive arts, cinema, literature. E 'in these arts that we see a connotation where the sense, taste, the pleasure of beauty and are very positive, for the most part, disappeared. It is not to say is the reality, the reality is that the arts and represent the reality. Yes, its representatives, but nothing and no one can impose to represent the only way. In nature there is only black. There is the whole spectrum of colors. There is nothing more conformist, more antichrists that persist to get in through and through his glasses and blacks simply do not see anything but black. And it is useless to smuggle this vision and progressive intellectual. It 's just a short-sighted disappear where the reason, the distinctions and differentiations. Continue really the decline not only of 'the West, but also globally. Who writes this blog not resigned to this vision. in life does not see a paradise, but refuses to see only the 'hell. He wants to open eyes and mind on all that is beautiful, that is positive, which is positively worth, large or small. Look at all the flowers of beauty and positivity of thought, science, art, daily life and at this location and provides space and all this indicates a collective name for fantasy Floral.

How Do You Fix Blotches On An Lcd Screen

Praise' chiagni and fuck '

The Conference Board Bishops of Europe (CCEE) was established last autumn a Observatory on Intolerance and Discrimination against Christians in Europe , in order to document on the recommendation of the local churches who are considered acts of discrimination against citizens because of their Christian faith, under the well-known because meticulous punctuality denounced by church hierarchies, the alleged climate of secularization of the continent, the climate is often defined in no uncertain terms 'anti-Christian' or more elegantly 'dictatorship of relativism'.

In particular reports relating to our country, we also cover events well known, such as failure to visit the Wisdom of Benedict the sixteenth or the failure to appoint Rocco Buttiglione as EU Commissioner, or the fact that in the year of Jubilee 2000 in Rome has agreed to perform at the World Gay Pride, of course, pervades everything; the 'case vs Lautsy. Italy 'exposure of the crucifix in schools, on which the European Court has yet to issue a final ruling.

If Christians in Europe are right or not to feel 'discriminated' is evident to all, and it is clear that these initiatives also fit perfectly in the smart and aggressive tactics of this pontificate, the counter also compared with the average of pontificates' last century, which in this case uses the proven method chiagni and fuck "benefit from all the victims of unjustified continuing to cheat others.

Now, one might suppose that the Pope has not read Aesop and want to continue now beginning to cry 'wolf' in our continent, but it happens that this kind of whining, a paradigm of intellectual dishonesty and moral poverty of vertices of CC, sounds particularly unpleasant and inappropriate in the light of genuine persecution that Christians are suffering in these weeks in Nigeria, Egypt, Pakistan or the Philippines, as noted and stigmatized by the same Pontiff, in a kind of reversal that turns historic again Considerable proportions-in-the positions had crystallized as the edict of Constantine onwards, and with the Church now oblivious of the real-persecution-which it has inflicted over the centuries (up to just less than two centuries ago) anyone who does not conform to his doctrine and its political, economic and social development. By comparison, the coarse contemporary battle to continue to keep attached to the walls, however, thanks to a decree of the fascist regime, its brand is very small.

Even the popes do not learn anything from history.

Already published here .
________________________________________________

Update: the site Uaar writes today that Introvigne got the post of OSCE representative for combating racism, xenophobia and discrimination. This was announced by the Zenit Catholic site, stating that Introvigne will pay "particular attention to discrimination against Christians and members of other religions.

'Chiagnere' pay ...

Mini Coopercost Of Oil Change

sex marriages: Look for the new no

The Constitutional Court judges have rejected once more appeals in different times and places (but part of a common strategy in particular the radical Association Some Rights campaign appropriately called "Civil Claim") by the Italian association against LGBT waste some municipalities agree to publication of marriage presented by some homosexual couples, in a ruling in which it is made clear between- the other-that Article 29 of the Constitution "the diversity of sex is essential" so that the marriage can be celebrated and to have legal validity. The proceedings are quasi-term-initiative launched three years ago by certain rights and the network of lawyers Network Lenford , according to which necessarily had to come-because of the inaction of the Parliament to refer the question- the Constitutional Court.

Catholics around the world rejoices, on the other hand some talk about 'political decision' or, for those who use tones particolarmenre on, 'Pilate', in fact, a good read Article 29 of our Constitution:

"The Republic recognizes the rights of the family as a natural society founded on marriage. Marriage is based on the moral and legal equality of spouses within the limits established by law to guarantee family unity"

you find that it merely speak of 'spouse' does not speak explicitly of their sex, then this article would seem to subjective interpretation, or simply based on custom and 'tradition' and the etymological interpretation of the word 'marriage': it should be noted that customs and 'traditions' in this case are fundamentally and inevitably based on the doctrine of a religion and do not take account of progress and adjustments of civil costumes, so they are even in conflict with the secular state. A serious discussion on this topic will sooner or later dealt with seriously in this country, which theoretically times worse for the led to the approval of the courageous secular laws on abortion and divorce.

The interpretation of the judges of the recent ruling reasoned Look around you could at least push-to-start with civil unions rather than with marriage itself, provided of course that the rights and duties equivalent to heterosexual marriage. In order not to get mixed up in a pointless dispute on the etymology of the words or the actuality, the opportunities that they are understood and under what parameters: please leave the Catholic Church the 'copyright' of the word marriage, although we do not have it. A step back-in-waiting for better times could perhaps speed up the discussion of the bill filed by time in Parliament, to which the same Look in rejecting the appeals has postponed more than once (assuming it is clear that we intend to give up finally the institution of marriage): at the bottom not in all European countries where the rights of homosexuals are protected there is gay marriage, the case of Sweden and even in the very Catholic Spain, but not in the evolved Denmark, where, however, there are civil unions and is also the expected 'adoption.

Now the battle moves to the associations in the field of riconoscomento celebrated in countries where unions are possibile. In the meantime, it will again rely on European institutions, particularly the European Court of Human Rights, trusting one-another-at least in reference to the Italian Parliament (which did not spontaneously address the issue ever, influenced as it is by Vatican), while hoping that the arrival Eastern nations that are lagging behind in terms of civil rights and their backs to the dictates of religion does not compromise the action and the principle of secularism.

Already published here .

Roman Mythology Allusion

The electorate mythical

To date not yet known if this legislature will come to its natural end in 2013 or if you are going to early elections in 2011, observing the 'Vietnam parliamentary' of recent weeks and comparing it with that of the previous term, you could be back-to-date the probability to 51% for early elections and 49% for continuation-quiet-more or less of the legislature, much depends also by the 'market of Deputies', still going to work who just shouted for years immorality of the "turnaround".

Whatever happens, the campaign-which actually goes on without interruption since 1994 - is about to reach the peak: it officially opens, therefore, the hunting season in the Catholic electorate. In this hunt, notoriously, involved everyone, excluding the Radicals (and a few isolated parliamentary particularly daring), from Berlusconi to Nichi Vendola, both very little credibility as a champion of Catholic values \u200b\u200bfor reasons different: the first known for his personal affairs, the latter because a politician says that homosexual Catholic and attentive to the values \u200b\u200bof religion at least creates confusion in those who attend its policy reference area. Of note is the end of the bluff finiano : Freedom and the Future too rushed to smooth the Vatican slipping in fed court elbowing defenders of 'traditional values' and Catholicism.

But really this part of the electorate is decisive? Interviewed by Lettera43.it Luigi Bassani, Professor of Political Thought at the University of Milan, demystify the importance of the Catholic vote, saying that Catholics feel more free by external conditions than when there was still the Christian Democrats (which contrasted with a strong Communist Party), an assertion also supported by the result of an Ipsos poll the end of 2009 the Catholic vote which you learn by reading a few things, and is confirms other. In particular, we note two facts, among others: first, 56% of respondents declare that the particulars of the clergy to be heard but in the end must prevail to his conscience, against 19% according to which should always be followed, secondly, 54% believe that there are political forces that represent the values \u200b\u200bof other more traditional Catholics (the majority of the remaining points of the UDC party Casini as reference). Finally as data on the largest opposition party : only 23% of respondents believe that certainly the Democratic Party is able to represent instances of Catholics (35% for you but only in part and 30% definitely not) .

This further confirms that, in a country that is largely still the hypocritical mess described in the pages of Guareschi, the alleged importance of Catholic values \u200b\u200bin the electoral programs is ultimately on the effectiveness of propaganda reigning power , is deceptive and is not in the conviction of the great bulk of the electorate but it is only a result of building games that serve to preserve the ideologicizzate power of the lobbies of Catholic inspiration, according to a quid pro quo as old as the world to which the policy continues to bend. But you will have confirmation of this view only when the leadership finally 'enlightened' and out of games palace (These 'traditional') by some party will have the courage to focus on the reality, to write in his election program as a means meet the real needs of citizens, and not what's the moral that should reign by law.

Already published here .