Tuesday, December 28, 2010
Monday, December 27, 2010
Frequent Numbers In Ohio Lottery
purified parties (even secular)
Among the historical controversy always in vogue among believers and nonbelievers, reappeared this time of year that, frankly useless, respect for religious holidays: If you do not believe, believers say, then you should also work Christmas, Easter, and all religious holidays, which, in effect, has its own logic. In reality you need to divide the discourse on different levels. Individual workers do not have much choice: for example, who, not believing, working on farms under the parties close what should be done, open up a sole proprietorship for only two weeks and work on their own? And, if so, at which customers? Instead, the discourse of the holidays decided by national and local authorities is different, and needs to be addressed at the legislative level.
To begin with, it is clear that each of us needs a rest during the working week should be dedicated to himself, his family and his social life and to maintain an optimum physical well-being, and it is also clear that the collective shifts off work must be established so as not to affect the entire national economic system, must also be said that the current organization of the calendar (daughter of the centuries of theocracy) can not be revolutionized in an instant . However, in the meantime we could make a modest proposal to help resolve the issue.
companies could - by decree law - collecting information about their employees' adherence to a faith rather than another or none at all, by self-certification and subsequent verification by the Ministry of Labour and trade union representatives or the company's personnel management , thus Christian workers will step forward to staying home on Sundays (even those Christian workers who currently work seven days a week contrary to the precept of 'sanctification of the parties') and in the main Christian festivals, Muslim workers should stay home on Friday and during Ramadan, those of Jewish faith on Saturday, and so on. And then, as Paul of Tarsus had to write "who does not work do not eat, even the religious of all levels will find a job and a paycheck are guaranteed by the sweat of their brow (and not with that of all taxpayers Italians).
As for the workers non-believers, even forced them to work on November 1 and December 25, also had to clean the chandeliers and bring business leaders to walk the dogs, but has allowed them to stay home on 20 September and February 17, the day of the martyrdom of Giordano Bruno.
This, of course, is only a provocation , impractical and even unconstitutional, is a response to those believers who think they take into chestnut nonbelievers in their coherence without putting at stake his own. But - seriously speaking - it would be useful sooner or later face the question of religious holidays 'mandatory', and would also be interesting to see if the "government's doing," the government "liberal, libertarian and liberal" and labor productivity would have the courage to face it.
already published here . 
Among the historical controversy always in vogue among believers and nonbelievers, reappeared this time of year that, frankly useless, respect for religious holidays: If you do not believe, believers say, then you should also work Christmas, Easter, and all religious holidays, which, in effect, has its own logic. In reality you need to divide the discourse on different levels. Individual workers do not have much choice: for example, who, not believing, working on farms under the parties close what should be done, open up a sole proprietorship for only two weeks and work on their own? And, if so, at which customers? Instead, the discourse of the holidays decided by national and local authorities is different, and needs to be addressed at the legislative level.
To begin with, it is clear that each of us needs a rest during the working week should be dedicated to himself, his family and his social life and to maintain an optimum physical well-being, and it is also clear that the collective shifts off work must be established so as not to affect the entire national economic system, must also be said that the current organization of the calendar (daughter of the centuries of theocracy) can not be revolutionized in an instant . However, in the meantime we could make a modest proposal to help resolve the issue.
companies could - by decree law - collecting information about their employees' adherence to a faith rather than another or none at all, by self-certification and subsequent verification by the Ministry of Labour and trade union representatives or the company's personnel management , thus Christian workers will step forward to staying home on Sundays (even those Christian workers who currently work seven days a week contrary to the precept of 'sanctification of the parties') and in the main Christian festivals, Muslim workers should stay home on Friday and during Ramadan, those of Jewish faith on Saturday, and so on. And then, as Paul of Tarsus had to write "who does not work do not eat, even the religious of all levels will find a job and a paycheck are guaranteed by the sweat of their brow (and not with that of all taxpayers Italians).
As for the workers non-believers, even forced them to work on November 1 and December 25, also had to clean the chandeliers and bring business leaders to walk the dogs, but has allowed them to stay home on 20 September and February 17, the day of the martyrdom of Giordano Bruno.
This, of course, is only a provocation , impractical and even unconstitutional, is a response to those believers who think they take into chestnut nonbelievers in their coherence without putting at stake his own. But - seriously speaking - it would be useful sooner or later face the question of religious holidays 'mandatory', and would also be interesting to see if the "government's doing," the government "liberal, libertarian and liberal" and labor productivity would have the courage to face it.
already published here .
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Cm Dries Up Before Period?
The Fermi paradox is that of God
In 1950, during a Los Alamos lunch with some colleagues from universities, the world-famous physicist Enrico Fermi formulated a question: "If the universe is teeming with aliens, where is everybody?", reviving a much more ancient in what by then was universally known as the Fermi Paradox . The question is obviously still present, because we do not find any trace of the existence of alien civilizations in the known universe, or at least in the Galaxy? The possible answers are hundreds, all fall into two major strands: the first is the 'can-', which explains the lack of evidence of extraterrestrial civilizations in various ways, from cosmic distances so inconceivably large as to render impossible any dialogue and before that the probability of receiving signals in a timely manner, the possibility that these signals are coming but we do not know how and where to look, from the possibility that alien civilizations that while there have a degree of technological progress very different from ours (upper or lower) the possibility that these civilizations are not at all interested in making contact with other civilizations. The second area of \u200b\u200bpossible responses, is reduced to a single reality: there are, so we have no feedback.
time in which the famous Italian physicist boost demand the existence of other life forms, the alleged sightings of UFOs (Unidentified Flying Object) was at the height, in addition, the literature of science fiction has provided thousands of 'proofs' and tales of alien civilizations, beginning with the 1951 short story The Sentinel Arthur Clarke, from which it was Suddenly the original subject of the cult movie 2001 Space Odyssey , but returning to science, was blatant admission of the Vatican's chief astronomer, Jesuit Father José Gabriel Funes Argentina , agencies reported a couple of years ago about the possibility that extraterrestrial life may exist. In fact, it is interesting to note that the Fermi paradox can be taken en bloc and transferred entirely in the field of religious and philosophical speculation, taking care to change the original object into a new one: Instead of proving the existence of alien civilizations in the cosmos we will need to search for evidence of a 'higher level' and the creator: We could call the paradox of god, but we would probably still have two lines of equal content of responses, especially the second.
For those who observe the religious phenomenon from afar, from a conservative safe distance typical of atheists and agnostics, it might be a sisntesi interesting-if it were reasonable, which is not, and if it does not stink away from sectarianism-the 'response' on one or the other paradox of religion the Raelians: born in the 70s, the Raelian movement argues that life on Earth, including mankind, was 'created' by terraforming Ingenieria genetics and procedures from a highly advanced alien race that is currently waiting for us accept this reality and decide to open up and rejoin them. Those who were to turn up your nose, first consider that this 'religion' while drawing liberally from ancient religions (the name of the people is alien Elohim, and the Old Testament - and other sacred texts are taken-even the 'prophets' we know), is devoid of dogmatic rigidity of the latter about some sensitive issues such as homosexuality; but it is still true that is produced in other types of discrimination, as the hope of a new geniocrazia that excludes individuals less intellectually gifted. In any case, I wonder what he thought of Enrico Fermi.
Already published here . 
In 1950, during a Los Alamos lunch with some colleagues from universities, the world-famous physicist Enrico Fermi formulated a question: "If the universe is teeming with aliens, where is everybody?", reviving a much more ancient in what by then was universally known as the Fermi Paradox . The question is obviously still present, because we do not find any trace of the existence of alien civilizations in the known universe, or at least in the Galaxy? The possible answers are hundreds, all fall into two major strands: the first is the 'can-', which explains the lack of evidence of extraterrestrial civilizations in various ways, from cosmic distances so inconceivably large as to render impossible any dialogue and before that the probability of receiving signals in a timely manner, the possibility that these signals are coming but we do not know how and where to look, from the possibility that alien civilizations that while there have a degree of technological progress very different from ours (upper or lower) the possibility that these civilizations are not at all interested in making contact with other civilizations. The second area of \u200b\u200bpossible responses, is reduced to a single reality: there are, so we have no feedback.
time in which the famous Italian physicist boost demand the existence of other life forms, the alleged sightings of UFOs (Unidentified Flying Object) was at the height, in addition, the literature of science fiction has provided thousands of 'proofs' and tales of alien civilizations, beginning with the 1951 short story The Sentinel Arthur Clarke, from which it was Suddenly the original subject of the cult movie 2001 Space Odyssey , but returning to science, was blatant admission of the Vatican's chief astronomer, Jesuit Father José Gabriel Funes Argentina , agencies reported a couple of years ago about the possibility that extraterrestrial life may exist. In fact, it is interesting to note that the Fermi paradox can be taken en bloc and transferred entirely in the field of religious and philosophical speculation, taking care to change the original object into a new one: Instead of proving the existence of alien civilizations in the cosmos we will need to search for evidence of a 'higher level' and the creator: We could call the paradox of god, but we would probably still have two lines of equal content of responses, especially the second.
For those who observe the religious phenomenon from afar, from a conservative safe distance typical of atheists and agnostics, it might be a sisntesi interesting-if it were reasonable, which is not, and if it does not stink away from sectarianism-the 'response' on one or the other paradox of religion the Raelians: born in the 70s, the Raelian movement argues that life on Earth, including mankind, was 'created' by terraforming Ingenieria genetics and procedures from a highly advanced alien race that is currently waiting for us accept this reality and decide to open up and rejoin them. Those who were to turn up your nose, first consider that this 'religion' while drawing liberally from ancient religions (the name of the people is alien Elohim, and the Old Testament - and other sacred texts are taken-even the 'prophets' we know), is devoid of dogmatic rigidity of the latter about some sensitive issues such as homosexuality; but it is still true that is produced in other types of discrimination, as the hope of a new geniocrazia that excludes individuals less intellectually gifted. In any case, I wonder what he thought of Enrico Fermi.
Already published here .
Thursday, December 16, 2010
How Do I Delete Uverse Call Logs 2010
Italy, Catholics for large maneuvers
The 314 to 311 in the House, however it arrived, it was not only the victory of Berlusconi and Berlusconi, but also that of militant Catholicism, in which Knight is an extremely versatile ally and helpful, because it is extremely in need of electoral support that the Church can still move, there is more surprising that the bulk of the Catholic world will be able to pass safely on the night of bunga bunga, all 'ex-wife's abortion the Prime Minister (second divorce , for the record) and other moral transgressions gay official religion, that the impoverishment of society grows exponentially (but we estimate that poverty is one of the largest bodies 'election' of religion ...) because here - in Italy and the Vatican-talk about politics and not religion and morals.
So, let's see what happened in the last hour: first, Cardinal Bertone Berlusconi meets the eve of the parliamentary passage of the Government and just before the nth rain state funding to the Church obtained with the hijacking of an avalanche of public money allocated to the State dall'ottox1000 taken toward the latter, a bargaining always valuable, and now, after the Trust, we are witnessing the second phase, that is, the court made frantic by the Government to 'Catholic' in parliament with the announced creation of a "life groups" outside the PDL but perhaps should be in its orbit, return to tear the opposition parties-including in new Polo for the nation that sees its ranks the Catholic party par excellence, the UDC of Casini- as many MPs as possible to the sensitive topic, beginning with (they say) ineffable Binetti. What is at stake, or rather, a bargaining chip is the same, according to some observers, the law on end of life, invasion of public advice from associations pro-life, further support of the Government to appeal against the ruling in Strasbourg on crucifix in the home straight, obstacle hour alternative to religion and so on. We therefore envisage an acceleration in government to the issues still on the plate that are dear to Catholics.
In essence: the objective of Berlusconi crisis (before it rises again for the umpteenth time) and politics in general has also made the game a second time to the cause of the Catholics, who increasingly are close to a return to modern theocracy, the reassuring exercised 'intermediary institutions for faux-secular'.
We will see in the next few days, then you can say, in the words of Antonio de Curtis: which is the sum total. 
The 314 to 311 in the House, however it arrived, it was not only the victory of Berlusconi and Berlusconi, but also that of militant Catholicism, in which Knight is an extremely versatile ally and helpful, because it is extremely in need of electoral support that the Church can still move, there is more surprising that the bulk of the Catholic world will be able to pass safely on the night of bunga bunga, all 'ex-wife's abortion the Prime Minister (second divorce , for the record) and other moral transgressions gay official religion, that the impoverishment of society grows exponentially (but we estimate that poverty is one of the largest bodies 'election' of religion ...) because here - in Italy and the Vatican-talk about politics and not religion and morals.
So, let's see what happened in the last hour: first, Cardinal Bertone Berlusconi meets the eve of the parliamentary passage of the Government and just before the nth rain state funding to the Church obtained with the hijacking of an avalanche of public money allocated to the State dall'ottox1000 taken toward the latter, a bargaining always valuable, and now, after the Trust, we are witnessing the second phase, that is, the court made frantic by the Government to 'Catholic' in parliament with the announced creation of a "life groups" outside the PDL but perhaps should be in its orbit, return to tear the opposition parties-including in new Polo for the nation that sees its ranks the Catholic party par excellence, the UDC of Casini- as many MPs as possible to the sensitive topic, beginning with (they say) ineffable Binetti. What is at stake, or rather, a bargaining chip is the same, according to some observers, the law on end of life, invasion of public advice from associations pro-life, further support of the Government to appeal against the ruling in Strasbourg on crucifix in the home straight, obstacle hour alternative to religion and so on. We therefore envisage an acceleration in government to the issues still on the plate that are dear to Catholics.
In essence: the objective of Berlusconi crisis (before it rises again for the umpteenth time) and politics in general has also made the game a second time to the cause of the Catholics, who increasingly are close to a return to modern theocracy, the reassuring exercised 'intermediary institutions for faux-secular'.
We will see in the next few days, then you can say, in the words of Antonio de Curtis: which is the sum total.
Saturday, December 4, 2010
Orion Gate Brampton Telus Tuesday
The seizure of Eluana
With the announced establishment of the "National Day of the vegetative state" for February 9, the Berlusconi government and the associations that support it make the Catholicity latest violence on the body of Eluana , and this damage through the last blow to the dignity of free people. After trying to appropriate it as an object, a symbol of power and failed, now trying to steal at least the name of Eluana and her memory, using it (the verb used in its worst sense) as a weapon against those who oppose and violent totalitarian ideology of "life" trumpeted from the Catholic world, claiming the freedom only for himself.
This is the usual tactic to invade and suppression of the resistance of others, obtained with the reversal of the truth, falsification of history and often with the theft itself, to the kidnapping, the use Catholicism for two thousand years: the spread of false historical as the Donation of Constantine the alleged conversion of Antonio Gramsci , until recently, ridiculous praise of the Christian qualities of the film The Blues Brothers and even cartoons de The Simpsons: wherever you go, attacking religion, swallow , assimilate and excrete something totally different from the meaning upside down, provided it is useful to his cause. Known as the leopard can not change its spots, he MUST also take over the memory of a missing person making their own symbol, a "martyr" who died must serve at least to their cause, having refused to do in life, which is the extreme violence, the ultimate weapon.
In this case, the first theft (with skill) has to do with semantics, and that is what the word "life" in their hands is emptied of its deeper meaning (which includes the fullness of dignity and freedom of the person) becomes a screen dogmatic and oppressive, a manifesto of absolute power claimed by the 'thieves' above on every moment of human life from conception (sperm release) to an extreme that is so extreme that leaving the boundaries of biology, and is probably getting out of hand to them, because it has a lot to do with technology and scientific research, usually opposed by lorsignori advocates "pro-life." Then there is the
kidnapping : with yet another bold invasion and pain in the intimacy of his family, Eluana is literally removed from his life and memory of those who knew and loved, and enlisted despite his Catholicism in the service of madness: the recall, in their celebrations, completely distorting history, its vitality and its will (dignity and freedom), exploiting it as the worst pimps exploit women's bodies from which they draw money and power. Eluana become the trophy that they have always wanted to hang over their fireplace, it is not difficult to predict first-or later-even a Her beatification Journal, followed by sanctification (and all the usual support of Catholic idolatry), with which you apply the latest and final makeup of the Church of deception and embezzlement.
_______________________________________________
worth noting the ' MicroMega appeal to the proclamation, February 9th Day of freedom of choice over their lives. 
With the announced establishment of the "National Day of the vegetative state" for February 9, the Berlusconi government and the associations that support it make the Catholicity latest violence on the body of Eluana , and this damage through the last blow to the dignity of free people. After trying to appropriate it as an object, a symbol of power and failed, now trying to steal at least the name of Eluana and her memory, using it (the verb used in its worst sense) as a weapon against those who oppose and violent totalitarian ideology of "life" trumpeted from the Catholic world, claiming the freedom only for himself.
This is the usual tactic to invade and suppression of the resistance of others, obtained with the reversal of the truth, falsification of history and often with the theft itself, to the kidnapping, the use Catholicism for two thousand years: the spread of false historical as the Donation of Constantine the alleged conversion of Antonio Gramsci , until recently, ridiculous praise of the Christian qualities of the film The Blues Brothers and even cartoons de The Simpsons: wherever you go, attacking religion, swallow , assimilate and excrete something totally different from the meaning upside down, provided it is useful to his cause. Known as the leopard can not change its spots, he MUST also take over the memory of a missing person making their own symbol, a "martyr" who died must serve at least to their cause, having refused to do in life, which is the extreme violence, the ultimate weapon.
In this case, the first theft (with skill) has to do with semantics, and that is what the word "life" in their hands is emptied of its deeper meaning (which includes the fullness of dignity and freedom of the person) becomes a screen dogmatic and oppressive, a manifesto of absolute power claimed by the 'thieves' above on every moment of human life from conception (sperm release) to an extreme that is so extreme that leaving the boundaries of biology, and is probably getting out of hand to them, because it has a lot to do with technology and scientific research, usually opposed by lorsignori advocates "pro-life." Then there is the
kidnapping : with yet another bold invasion and pain in the intimacy of his family, Eluana is literally removed from his life and memory of those who knew and loved, and enlisted despite his Catholicism in the service of madness: the recall, in their celebrations, completely distorting history, its vitality and its will (dignity and freedom), exploiting it as the worst pimps exploit women's bodies from which they draw money and power. Eluana become the trophy that they have always wanted to hang over their fireplace, it is not difficult to predict first-or later-even a Her beatification Journal, followed by sanctification (and all the usual support of Catholic idolatry), with which you apply the latest and final makeup of the Church of deception and embezzlement.
_______________________________________________
worth noting the ' MicroMega appeal to the proclamation, February 9th Day of freedom of choice over their lives.
Wednesday, November 24, 2010
Low Iron In The Blood And Normal Hemoglobin
We will never Pacs?
In late October, the Italy of Values \u200b\u200bhas launched a kind of civil rights offensive, which is also a challenge to the allies of the Democratic Party, likely in the future as the UDC and that part of the same PD (as IDV, Antonio di Pietro admits) that "it is not yet ripe" to address certain issues. Among the proposals, the party of former magistrate of clean hands that also resurrects a law against homophobia and civil unions, not only for heterosexual couples, who had already attempted to tackle in the last parliament, but on the other hand does not cover 'adoption by homosexual couples.
While Mara Carfagna, Minister of Equal Opportunities, officially announced his resignation to the party infighting, resignations, which are in any case which seem appropriate given that the former show girl is one of the ministers most useless and inconclusive in this Government, Di Pietro explains that this is the right time for this proposal (presented with a press conference in the House a few days ago) "because, as soon as you exceed the hypocrisy of the Berlusconi family concept, the political forces that will ask voters to give them confidence must present a serious and concrete program, and "now because we say it will serve to not fall into the usual post-election confusion, when the political forces in an alliance without first agreeing on things to achieve for the country and then, after the vote, they find themselves fighting on the crucial issues. " remains the doubt that such a proposal when we in fact during the election campaign could instead push the parties in perpetual hunt for the Catholic vote to take a solemn pledge to the contrary to the proposal on civil unions, but on balance we will see who will have been right.
Until now, some local institutions have sought to address this lack with the establishment of registers of the partners with municipalities and municipalities, continues to dominate the attitude of those who hide behind the absence of a single law (Despite the many European and national decisions, the latter of which comes from the Constitutional Court in April, pushing in this direction) to avoid launching initiatives should also be well within their competence, as administrators a diverse audience of citizens, not all of 'lying' on Catholic morality. So we will see what will this bill also, but it seems even now to watch the trailer for a film already seen. 
In late October, the Italy of Values \u200b\u200bhas launched a kind of civil rights offensive, which is also a challenge to the allies of the Democratic Party, likely in the future as the UDC and that part of the same PD (as IDV, Antonio di Pietro admits) that "it is not yet ripe" to address certain issues. Among the proposals, the party of former magistrate of clean hands that also resurrects a law against homophobia and civil unions, not only for heterosexual couples, who had already attempted to tackle in the last parliament, but on the other hand does not cover 'adoption by homosexual couples.
While Mara Carfagna, Minister of Equal Opportunities, officially announced his resignation to the party infighting, resignations, which are in any case which seem appropriate given that the former show girl is one of the ministers most useless and inconclusive in this Government, Di Pietro explains that this is the right time for this proposal (presented with a press conference in the House a few days ago) "because, as soon as you exceed the hypocrisy of the Berlusconi family concept, the political forces that will ask voters to give them confidence must present a serious and concrete program, and "now because we say it will serve to not fall into the usual post-election confusion, when the political forces in an alliance without first agreeing on things to achieve for the country and then, after the vote, they find themselves fighting on the crucial issues. " remains the doubt that such a proposal when we in fact during the election campaign could instead push the parties in perpetual hunt for the Catholic vote to take a solemn pledge to the contrary to the proposal on civil unions, but on balance we will see who will have been right.
years that I'm actually talking about draft laws on civil unions, often imaginatively dubbed (I say, Cus, DiDoRe ...) but always buried even before they begin to discuss, yet in this area 's Italy is absolutely behind the majority of the countries of Western Europe and other advanced nations outside the continent, when in fact there would be no need because the 'form' of the family is constantly changing and evolving, not is only the traditional (and exclusively heterosexual) and strongly supported exclusively by political parties, with few exceptions, and the Church, there are millions of individuals in couples and families outside of the canon that currently have almost no protection which is not a private document, when you decide to make, easy to handle by the relatives of either family of partners in case of conflicts or disagreements between the parties, especially with regard to the survivor's pension, inheritance and the recognition of / living together as a family in the sad circumstances, but always as a possible assistance to the hospital. A condition that demeans and often sorely hurt the depth of relationships sometimes laboriously constructed because of the backwardness of this country's culture. Hence the need to explain and reassure the most conservative of the public, as it does when Franco Grillini that says that on Pacs "is a law that does not impose anything on anyone, and 'a contract and who wants the signs . Recognizing the rights to some and not 'a threat to the rights of others. "
Until now, some local institutions have sought to address this lack with the establishment of registers of the partners with municipalities and municipalities, continues to dominate the attitude of those who hide behind the absence of a single law (Despite the many European and national decisions, the latter of which comes from the Constitutional Court in April, pushing in this direction) to avoid launching initiatives should also be well within their competence, as administrators a diverse audience of citizens, not all of 'lying' on Catholic morality. So we will see what will this bill also, but it seems even now to watch the trailer for a film already seen.
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
Toddler Irregular Heartrate At Night
Fiat lux versus Big Bang Five
The Large Hadron Collider in Geneva have recreated the primordial conditions of matter, ie the highest temperatures were reached, the order of trillions of degrees, as is supposed to be a split second after the Big Bang, when the components of subatomic particles (quarks and gluons) were free and formed a sort of hot plasma. Observers in the Roque de los Muchachos in the Canary Islands and the Hobby-Eberly Telescope in Texas, has begun analyzing the data that have allowed us to confirm the theory that complex organic molecules (including some carbon compounds such as anthracene and fullerene ), which are the basis of life, are not only the heavenly bodies like planets and asteroids, but also in interstellar space, after being expelled from the outer layers of stars in the expansion phase, throughout the universe known. Finally, at CERN in Geneva was isolated antimatter, theorized in the twenties and now finally established.
This is just to wait, then inevitably you must surrender and you will get the solution that will perhaps save the world: humanity enter the library, take the holy books and finally pull them down from the shelf of history to put them in the most appropriate: literature of fantasy. 
The Large Hadron Collider in Geneva have recreated the primordial conditions of matter, ie the highest temperatures were reached, the order of trillions of degrees, as is supposed to be a split second after the Big Bang, when the components of subatomic particles (quarks and gluons) were free and formed a sort of hot plasma. Observers in the Roque de los Muchachos in the Canary Islands and the Hobby-Eberly Telescope in Texas, has begun analyzing the data that have allowed us to confirm the theory that complex organic molecules (including some carbon compounds such as anthracene and fullerene ), which are the basis of life, are not only the heavenly bodies like planets and asteroids, but also in interstellar space, after being expelled from the outer layers of stars in the expansion phase, throughout the universe known. Finally, at CERN in Geneva was isolated antimatter, theorized in the twenties and now finally established.
As you follow these findings as important and that scientific theories are confirmed experimentally, the intervention of a creator god, and then the very existence of a god, is moved further and further behind over time when creationists less reactionary and obscurantist put it, accepting the fact his teeth, just before the Big Bang, identifying the latter event with the biblical "fiat lux", having had to admit - in the person of the Director of the Vatican Observatory - even the possibility that universe there are other intelligent species. This will be demonstrated at least until the cyclical nature of the universe (big bang - the expansion - contraction - big crunch and off again) or that Stephen Hawking is right in his Grand design (on the mechanism of spontaneous creation), then who knows where to put the poor god . Other creationists (to understand, such as those in America explain the morphology of the Grand Canyon with the move - physical, material - to god in that place) but are still in the trenches, and claim to scientifically interpret the sacred texts and to impose the 'teaching creationist theories in schools.
This is just to wait, then inevitably you must surrender and you will get the solution that will perhaps save the world: humanity enter the library, take the holy books and finally pull them down from the shelf of history to put them in the most appropriate: literature of fantasy.
Monday, November 15, 2010
Skate Sharpener Machine For Sale
clichés about gay men and an appeal to Tremonti
Because every time you talk about gay people is unleashed debate based on the usual cliches and prejudices, we try to do some 'clarity, hoping to be helpful who now form his own thought listening to a single bell. Summing up as much as possible for reasons of space, but inviting the reader to further investigate without prejudice.
1 "homosexuality is unnatural"
people who make this objection should be asked: What is nature? What is natural and what is not? Everything that exists is' natural 'for the very fact of existence, then so is homosexuality, emotional and sexual orientation variant, which also manifests itself-has been shown in numerous animal species-and not only in ' man, not to mention hermaphroditism of some animal species (and plants) that we do, we will represent "unnatural", even the animal kingdom? It 'should also be noted that this is a minority phenomenon, but that has always existed (and will always exist), so even the common objection that says: "If we were all gay man would become extinct," it just sounds paradoxical and out place: we are not all gay, do not we have never been and never will, otherwise we should be extinct long ago.
In fact, this objection is based simply on the morale of some religions (before you say that their homosexuality was not "against nature"), moral in turn based on certain interpretations of certain passages of sacred texts on s never been such a unique feeling even within the same Catholic Church (of which we are concerned because we are in Italy, but the discussion should be extended to all the monotheistic religions), but do be careful, because morality changes over time and with the needs, and knows precisely the fact that for centuries the Church has corrected some of his positions that were virtually dogmas, and in some cases has even asked excuse: so today's Jews are not as "evil and God-killers "The whites are no longer superior to blacks (and slavery is no longer allowed), the women finally have the 'soul the limbo no more and so on. Of course, we could wait for a Pope also admits this mistake, and sooner or later it will happen for sure, but in the meantime the pain caused unjust will have these positions?
2 "homosexuality is a choice"
Consequently, even this is not true: if the affective orientation, even before the sexual inclination is a natural and spontaneous, the only "choice" possible, rather , if you go along and live openly, defying social conventions and cultural need, and the hostility of power, or even if it hide-and-a lifetime to give in to this particular version of Stockholm syndrome fear or laziness, lack of information or the illusion of serenity.
3 "homosexuals are restricted"
Given that Mussolini's fascism is dead and buried, and then you no longer have a moral obligation to 'give the children to the homeland', is all too easy to point out that there are also many infertile heterosexual couples who, for consistency, should be considered "unnatural" just like the man. This is because the objection considers procreation only within a sexual relationship between two people who have signed a 'contract' (religious marriage), considered as the only reason to create the pair itself. And even earlier, and more often than not, those who make these objections reduces sexuality-one of the highest levels of communication between human beings-to a mere matter of anatomy and "joints" (concave-convex), we must respond to them with a crude but essential question: the 'love heterosexual vaginal intercourse is exhausted? It 's all there?
Even with all this evidence is a cultural heritage already exceeded in practice for heterosexual couples, for which they are admitted by the religions, with some distinctions, artificial insemination and adoption. Luckily, it is no longer allowed him strupr followed by the seizure of the unborn or incest (see the events narrated in the ancient patriarchs will) ...
4 "a child needs a father and a mother"
This statement also comes from immobility of our cultural tradition, a phenomenon that occurs only in European-or: in this measurement in those countries where the Catholicism is strongest. It may seem trivial, but what really counts in the development of an individual is the quality of affection and emotional support and education that the subject perceives by the familiar figures of reference. There are numerous studies conducted in countries where the adoption by homosexual couples are allowed to confirm that the development of children in these areas is quite comparable to that which occurs in heterosexual families.
The inclusion in society after leaving the protective shell of the family in this respect is obvious that in liberal societies and without prejudices about homosexuality this entry will be no particular difficulty, as opposed to society too tied to the Catholic faith traditions ( Specifically, because the Reformed and Protestant Christian churches are not produced in the kind of constraints on companies in which they are posted) and if "the company is not ready" to same-sex parenting as she feels too often say, it is also because society does not begin to ever 'Prepare'.
Another common objection is that the desire for parenthood by gay people would just "selfishness", well, feeling that this place belongs to a large number of people irrespective of their emotions / sexuality, it is well to note that no can afford to judge from the outside what happens in people's heads.
it must be stressed, finally, not to want to bury our heads in the sand will have to admit that homosexual families are in fact already exist, and are those whose children were born from previous reports and are included in the new reality of a family of the two parents, and of course all those unmarried couples ever seen statistics and relevant institutions.
5 "homosexuality is a threat to society"
In full: legalize gay marriages would be a danger to the families 'natural' and therefore to society. Curious that this observation does not follow her never convincingly demonstrated, supported by hard facts: how to constitute a threat, what is the cause-effect relationship? Emulation? But then why do not all become heterosexual gay, as gay and straight have always lived closely?
In fact, of all the misconceptions and prejudices about homosexuality this is by far the most dangerous, because it is at least a de facto incitement to racial hatred, being a theory that fear creeps a not substantially justified (that is an outright lie) and suggests a solution -based discrimination.
In Italy too, where there is not any protection for couples but not for gay people, the statement is a paradox and it sounds like another hoax.
_____________________________________________________________
In conclusion, a fact that the prejudices of the above are based mainly on the ideology of religions that are not even shared and practiced by all citizens, not only said that homosexuality is not an unnatural phenomenon, a "lifestyle" based on a number of unjustified claims, or a threat to society, but the issue goes before reversed and finally pulled out from the field of moral and then framed by a different perspective , that is inserted in the field of civilization and equality, because this country is (or should be) a secular, ask, because if gay citizens have-rightly-equal obligations should only have half the rights of those heterosexuals? Why have not we talk about an institution at least comparable to marriage, protection against homophobia and a halt to propaganda against the Catholic gay people?
The ministers who filled the stage of the Conference on the Family of Milan, and in particular to the Economy, Giulio Tremonti (or those who will follow, as currently its chair, as the entire government Berlusconi quater, somewhat wobbly ) we appeal: that gay citizens, couples and individuals, who like other work, form families, generate income and pay taxes with which they are funded services for citizens as heterosexuals (including believers), not not only be forced to pay more taxes, as well called by the Mayor of Rome Gianni Alemanno with unparalleled electoral indifference, but that the tax burden to them is reduced by half . At least until the restoration of equal rights for all citizens.
Already published here in synthetic version; contributions Tiziana Ficacci of NoGoD : a and two . Related articles: Praise dell'eufemismo , those are ... Series B , Travel in Europe . 
Because every time you talk about gay people is unleashed debate based on the usual cliches and prejudices, we try to do some 'clarity, hoping to be helpful who now form his own thought listening to a single bell. Summing up as much as possible for reasons of space, but inviting the reader to further investigate without prejudice.
1 "homosexuality is unnatural"
people who make this objection should be asked: What is nature? What is natural and what is not? Everything that exists is' natural 'for the very fact of existence, then so is homosexuality, emotional and sexual orientation variant, which also manifests itself-has been shown in numerous animal species-and not only in ' man, not to mention hermaphroditism of some animal species (and plants) that we do, we will represent "unnatural", even the animal kingdom? It 'should also be noted that this is a minority phenomenon, but that has always existed (and will always exist), so even the common objection that says: "If we were all gay man would become extinct," it just sounds paradoxical and out place: we are not all gay, do not we have never been and never will, otherwise we should be extinct long ago.
In fact, this objection is based simply on the morale of some religions (before you say that their homosexuality was not "against nature"), moral in turn based on certain interpretations of certain passages of sacred texts on s never been such a unique feeling even within the same Catholic Church (of which we are concerned because we are in Italy, but the discussion should be extended to all the monotheistic religions), but do be careful, because morality changes over time and with the needs, and knows precisely the fact that for centuries the Church has corrected some of his positions that were virtually dogmas, and in some cases has even asked excuse: so today's Jews are not as "evil and God-killers "The whites are no longer superior to blacks (and slavery is no longer allowed), the women finally have the 'soul the limbo no more and so on. Of course, we could wait for a Pope also admits this mistake, and sooner or later it will happen for sure, but in the meantime the pain caused unjust will have these positions?
2 "homosexuality is a choice"
Consequently, even this is not true: if the affective orientation, even before the sexual inclination is a natural and spontaneous, the only "choice" possible, rather , if you go along and live openly, defying social conventions and cultural need, and the hostility of power, or even if it hide-and-a lifetime to give in to this particular version of Stockholm syndrome fear or laziness, lack of information or the illusion of serenity.
3 "homosexuals are restricted"
Given that Mussolini's fascism is dead and buried, and then you no longer have a moral obligation to 'give the children to the homeland', is all too easy to point out that there are also many infertile heterosexual couples who, for consistency, should be considered "unnatural" just like the man. This is because the objection considers procreation only within a sexual relationship between two people who have signed a 'contract' (religious marriage), considered as the only reason to create the pair itself. And even earlier, and more often than not, those who make these objections reduces sexuality-one of the highest levels of communication between human beings-to a mere matter of anatomy and "joints" (concave-convex), we must respond to them with a crude but essential question: the 'love heterosexual vaginal intercourse is exhausted? It 's all there?
Even with all this evidence is a cultural heritage already exceeded in practice for heterosexual couples, for which they are admitted by the religions, with some distinctions, artificial insemination and adoption. Luckily, it is no longer allowed him strupr followed by the seizure of the unborn or incest (see the events narrated in the ancient patriarchs will) ...
4 "a child needs a father and a mother"
This statement also comes from immobility of our cultural tradition, a phenomenon that occurs only in European-or: in this measurement in those countries where the Catholicism is strongest. It may seem trivial, but what really counts in the development of an individual is the quality of affection and emotional support and education that the subject perceives by the familiar figures of reference. There are numerous studies conducted in countries where the adoption by homosexual couples are allowed to confirm that the development of children in these areas is quite comparable to that which occurs in heterosexual families.
The inclusion in society after leaving the protective shell of the family in this respect is obvious that in liberal societies and without prejudices about homosexuality this entry will be no particular difficulty, as opposed to society too tied to the Catholic faith traditions ( Specifically, because the Reformed and Protestant Christian churches are not produced in the kind of constraints on companies in which they are posted) and if "the company is not ready" to same-sex parenting as she feels too often say, it is also because society does not begin to ever 'Prepare'.
Another common objection is that the desire for parenthood by gay people would just "selfishness", well, feeling that this place belongs to a large number of people irrespective of their emotions / sexuality, it is well to note that no can afford to judge from the outside what happens in people's heads.
it must be stressed, finally, not to want to bury our heads in the sand will have to admit that homosexual families are in fact already exist, and are those whose children were born from previous reports and are included in the new reality of a family of the two parents, and of course all those unmarried couples ever seen statistics and relevant institutions.
5 "homosexuality is a threat to society"
In full: legalize gay marriages would be a danger to the families 'natural' and therefore to society. Curious that this observation does not follow her never convincingly demonstrated, supported by hard facts: how to constitute a threat, what is the cause-effect relationship? Emulation? But then why do not all become heterosexual gay, as gay and straight have always lived closely?
In fact, of all the misconceptions and prejudices about homosexuality this is by far the most dangerous, because it is at least a de facto incitement to racial hatred, being a theory that fear creeps a not substantially justified (that is an outright lie) and suggests a solution -based discrimination.
In Italy too, where there is not any protection for couples but not for gay people, the statement is a paradox and it sounds like another hoax.
_____________________________________________________________
In conclusion, a fact that the prejudices of the above are based mainly on the ideology of religions that are not even shared and practiced by all citizens, not only said that homosexuality is not an unnatural phenomenon, a "lifestyle" based on a number of unjustified claims, or a threat to society, but the issue goes before reversed and finally pulled out from the field of moral and then framed by a different perspective , that is inserted in the field of civilization and equality, because this country is (or should be) a secular, ask, because if gay citizens have-rightly-equal obligations should only have half the rights of those heterosexuals? Why have not we talk about an institution at least comparable to marriage, protection against homophobia and a halt to propaganda against the Catholic gay people?
The ministers who filled the stage of the Conference on the Family of Milan, and in particular to the Economy, Giulio Tremonti (or those who will follow, as currently its chair, as the entire government Berlusconi quater, somewhat wobbly ) we appeal: that gay citizens, couples and individuals, who like other work, form families, generate income and pay taxes with which they are funded services for citizens as heterosexuals (including believers), not not only be forced to pay more taxes, as well called by the Mayor of Rome Gianni Alemanno with unparalleled electoral indifference, but that the tax burden to them is reduced by half . At least until the restoration of equal rights for all citizens.
______________________________________________________________
Already published here in synthetic version; contributions Tiziana Ficacci of NoGoD : a and two . Related articles: Praise dell'eufemismo , those are ... Series B , Travel in Europe .
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
How High Do You Hang A Curtain Holdback?
The real homophobia and the fourth power
"Berlusconi attacks gay", "Berlusconi insults the gay." These catastrophic titles of some of the major dailies on newsstands in recent days about the stupid joke - also perfectly consistent with the substance character - that the Prime Minister has given the Fair, trying to justify his private affairs with some women and showing the other hand, once again, that man, when it is expressed in following his own freewheeling nature, is more worthy of an inn of the lowest category of the palaces of power.
If the joke is in itself so stupid and do not deserve to be out of place - despite the general indignation - no comment, two aspects are a side issue that should be underlined. The first concerns the fact that some newspapers, commenting on yet another Berlusconi gaffe (whether or not changes little media strategy) spoke of "machismo", even homophobia: no joking matter, homophobia is something else, and has little to do with machismo, homophobia is discrimination based on ideological speculation that has its roots in ' ancient Catholic propaganda, which the Italian society is so saturated that even the most does not seem that there is no attitude of contempt for homosexual persons, but rather the proper reporting of a condition "naturally unnatural" (there are steps the pun ) homosexuality.
The index of this is also given by the corollary of paradoxical statements and very sad for those who have the thankless task of defending the leader and always - a real job! - Or simply a fellow party members. Take for example the Hon. Santanche, according to which Berlusconi is right because "every family dreams of a heterosexual son", or official statements prior to Berlusconi's jokes, like the philosopher (?) Rocco Buttiglione, who says that being gay is wrong as not paying taxes. Worthy tavern cronies of the Prime Minister.
The second thing to point out concerns the mass media, which evidently believe gay people deserve the front page, if there's only half of Berlusconi. Yet homophobic statements tremendously more serious and vicious arrive every day from Oltretevere, bouncing on this side of the river from inside the palace, from which come amplified. It is therefore legitimate to ask what is worse: to make a joke about gays or support third-graders with obstinacy that homosexual persons are a threat to the family and for society as a whole?
Theorizing racism itself against a minority, bragging that this constitutes a danger to the majority, was for centuries the most effective way to justify some of the greatest tragedies of humanity, yet these statements fools never ends on the front page with the same emphasis of these days, as if there were in newspaper editors a sort of evil addictive (or even lack of interest: best scandal, makes it more) to the religious propaganda, with the result that we behave as if we had all been lobotomized and chloroformed, stripped of the capacity for indignation and play ' alarm when it is needed.
is why in all this, no small part of your responsibility is to be attributed to media sensationalism, political absorbed by a cheap and successful, the bulk of the media has given up his role as a sentinel of democracy, offset the strong powers, generator informed debate and conscience free. The media, in contrast, are prone in power even when they claim to be his pride against. The quality of a democracy is measured also by the condition of minorities and the degree of freedom of conscience and the media. For this reason, beyond the trivial out of the worst prime minister in history, if we can rightly say that this democracy is sick, it's up to us to respond: Even with the media.
Already published here. 
"Berlusconi attacks gay", "Berlusconi insults the gay." These catastrophic titles of some of the major dailies on newsstands in recent days about the stupid joke - also perfectly consistent with the substance character - that the Prime Minister has given the Fair, trying to justify his private affairs with some women and showing the other hand, once again, that man, when it is expressed in following his own freewheeling nature, is more worthy of an inn of the lowest category of the palaces of power.
If the joke is in itself so stupid and do not deserve to be out of place - despite the general indignation - no comment, two aspects are a side issue that should be underlined. The first concerns the fact that some newspapers, commenting on yet another Berlusconi gaffe (whether or not changes little media strategy) spoke of "machismo", even homophobia: no joking matter, homophobia is something else, and has little to do with machismo, homophobia is discrimination based on ideological speculation that has its roots in ' ancient Catholic propaganda, which the Italian society is so saturated that even the most does not seem that there is no attitude of contempt for homosexual persons, but rather the proper reporting of a condition "naturally unnatural" (there are steps the pun ) homosexuality.
The index of this is also given by the corollary of paradoxical statements and very sad for those who have the thankless task of defending the leader and always - a real job! - Or simply a fellow party members. Take for example the Hon. Santanche, according to which Berlusconi is right because "every family dreams of a heterosexual son", or official statements prior to Berlusconi's jokes, like the philosopher (?) Rocco Buttiglione, who says that being gay is wrong as not paying taxes. Worthy tavern cronies of the Prime Minister.
The second thing to point out concerns the mass media, which evidently believe gay people deserve the front page, if there's only half of Berlusconi. Yet homophobic statements tremendously more serious and vicious arrive every day from Oltretevere, bouncing on this side of the river from inside the palace, from which come amplified. It is therefore legitimate to ask what is worse: to make a joke about gays or support third-graders with obstinacy that homosexual persons are a threat to the family and for society as a whole?
Theorizing racism itself against a minority, bragging that this constitutes a danger to the majority, was for centuries the most effective way to justify some of the greatest tragedies of humanity, yet these statements fools never ends on the front page with the same emphasis of these days, as if there were in newspaper editors a sort of evil addictive (or even lack of interest: best scandal, makes it more) to the religious propaganda, with the result that we behave as if we had all been lobotomized and chloroformed, stripped of the capacity for indignation and play ' alarm when it is needed.
is why in all this, no small part of your responsibility is to be attributed to media sensationalism, political absorbed by a cheap and successful, the bulk of the media has given up his role as a sentinel of democracy, offset the strong powers, generator informed debate and conscience free. The media, in contrast, are prone in power even when they claim to be his pride against. The quality of a democracy is measured also by the condition of minorities and the degree of freedom of conscience and the media. For this reason, beyond the trivial out of the worst prime minister in history, if we can rightly say that this democracy is sick, it's up to us to respond: Even with the media.
Already published here.
Friday, October 29, 2010
Pos System For Frozen Yogurt Shops
Ateofobi the fray
According to Minister Frattini, the latest in a long series of ateofobi institutions, the atheists would be such a threat to society to make urgent need for a "holy alliance" between the monotheistic religions (two of which, it should be noted, along with other totalitarian ideologies have made the greatest slaughter in history) to fight them, and then think about a "new humanism to counter this perverse". He says in a step letter Osservatore Romano, where he also performed in the usual defense office of the crucifix "symbol of the secular state." What would the Minister, the reopening of the courts of the Inquisition to send the atheists at the stake?
If it is not necessary to respond to the statements of Frattini, who had already defined secularism "reverse racism" , (and expecting to be able to understand how the atheists would be a threat to society, then how should play this fight against them) is rather useful to give an alarm to all the lay Italians, but also atheists or believers Critics' Catholic adults, "as it was Weather: the condition of non-believers is no longer an irrelevant detail are already the rights of non-believers are lower than those of the believers (ie, on civil unions law on end of life, religion hour, more funding or less absurd requirements and other privileges to the Church, etc..), then if the crazy idea of \u200b\u200bthe 'crusade' against non-believers should have happened then it would play in our lives everyday in all its aspects. So just shut , but wake up and react, in all areas and every day! 
According to Minister Frattini, the latest in a long series of ateofobi institutions, the atheists would be such a threat to society to make urgent need for a "holy alliance" between the monotheistic religions (two of which, it should be noted, along with other totalitarian ideologies have made the greatest slaughter in history) to fight them, and then think about a "new humanism to counter this perverse". He says in a step letter Osservatore Romano, where he also performed in the usual defense office of the crucifix "symbol of the secular state." What would the Minister, the reopening of the courts of the Inquisition to send the atheists at the stake?
unspeakable These statements are based on lies and the dangerous effects, do not deserve comment except to stress that who produces a show so full of platitudes about atheism and so violently against a considerable part of Italian citizens, not worthy of his post of Minister of the Republic, and has done well to write to the Uaar Napolitano protest and demand the resignation of Franco Frattini: one that has an institutional role is so important and which should represent all Italians (if for no other reason to take all the salary, not only by believers) can say these things at home in front of the fireplace with his friends, not as a minister of the Republic.
remains rather to understand what they think the new crusaders of the so called 'devout atheists', those who have served so well the case in recent years: they are dangerous too? Giuliano Ferrara, who tried to found a party on abortion and calls for no mercy by the Church, Marcello Pera, who is a friend of the pope in person-say, Massimo Cacciari, immediately jumped up to defend the crucifix, and so on: they too must be normalized? Who knows, but you will notice that the war atheism is the new frontier of this pontificate, combattua on two fronts: one-this-is the frontal attack, which also makes use of many zealous papists flatterers of the pope even more who are inside the palace, the other is more subtle, and aims to use the undecided and opportunists (above) imprisoning cage in which they called the "Court of the Gentiles" mentioned in the last month by Archbishop Gianfranco Ravasi and all the Vatican hierarchy, which will ultimately be exhibited as trophies as the 'big game'. So the comparison is intended oltretevere.
If it is not necessary to respond to the statements of Frattini, who had already defined secularism "reverse racism" , (and expecting to be able to understand how the atheists would be a threat to society, then how should play this fight against them) is rather useful to give an alarm to all the lay Italians, but also atheists or believers Critics' Catholic adults, "as it was Weather: the condition of non-believers is no longer an irrelevant detail are already the rights of non-believers are lower than those of the believers (ie, on civil unions law on end of life, religion hour, more funding or less absurd requirements and other privileges to the Church, etc..), then if the crazy idea of \u200b\u200bthe 'crusade' against non-believers should have happened then it would play in our lives everyday in all its aspects. So just shut , but wake up and react, in all areas and every day!
Friday, October 22, 2010
Getus In Facebook Com
Denial and homophobia
After the case of university professor Teramo who gave a lesson on the tragedy of the Shoah denier , and in the wake of almost daily rants of Ahmadinejad and cronies, Riccardo Pacifici, the head of the Jewish community of Rome, proposed a law that punishes the denial. Assuming that we could not be farther from the positions of anyone denying the Holocaust, the question arises: in a country sick of secularism and rampant racism, because the denial needs a state law that punishes and homophobia rather not?
The Act concerns homophobia was finally sunk a year ago, in a Parliament has not even discussed blocking the vote on the ruling of unconstitutionality submitted by the party ultra-Catholic UDC and also voted by the PDL (Finian excluded) and the League, with dissenting votes instead of the PD and IDV.
We have just commemorated the deportation of Roman Jews from the ghetto on 16 October 1943, and every time we forget that the tragedy of the Holocaust have also found death homosexuals (and the Roma and other dissidents) would be a very good exercise for consistency and realism, as well as democracy, remember that racial discrimination - all - have the same gravity anywhere at any time. If it is desirable to have a clearer dividing line between freedom of opinion and propaganda of racist potentially (too often actively) el'incolumità dangerous for the freedom of certain 'categories' of citizens, then we must remember not to exclude anyone.
Incidentally, I am for freedom of expression, even the fools (as homophobic and negazonisti), but we can not ignore that some 'terms' have practical consequences different from the others, so that you could easily define 'propaganda', using a tremble in the last century had a very meaning left.
Perhaps the biggest problem today with respect to anti-Semitism and homophobia, which is an institutional bank even at some European governments. It 's true, however, create protected categories or unequal treatment of citizens is as pull a pickaxe to the liberal state, but in practice it ignores the consequences of religious propaganda against homosexuals, not for nothing that the Vatican and all the monotheistic religions have always opposed a law against homophobia (which exists in other countries) and understand why, as now also oppose the proposal of the rabbi of Rome. Want to have your hands-and language-free in both fields.
In short, this is not just verbal formulas negligible, because the words that open the way to the facts. It 's always been like that. We do not agree? Ok, give up the law against homophobia, but then also say no to the proposal for Pacifici, and also abolishes the Mancino law in its entirety.
The truth is that a truly liberal democracy and no difference between people working on it to get there on time, and if you need some 'corrections' to protect the physical safety and civil rights of some, and educate everyone mutual respect, Well then you have to do. Waiting for better times. 
After the case of university professor Teramo who gave a lesson on the tragedy of the Shoah denier , and in the wake of almost daily rants of Ahmadinejad and cronies, Riccardo Pacifici, the head of the Jewish community of Rome, proposed a law that punishes the denial. Assuming that we could not be farther from the positions of anyone denying the Holocaust, the question arises: in a country sick of secularism and rampant racism, because the denial needs a state law that punishes and homophobia rather not?
The Act concerns homophobia was finally sunk a year ago, in a Parliament has not even discussed blocking the vote on the ruling of unconstitutionality submitted by the party ultra-Catholic UDC and also voted by the PDL (Finian excluded) and the League, with dissenting votes instead of the PD and IDV.
comparing the positions that led to the two bills, it is not clear where it ends the right to express an opinion, as clearly unfounded, stupid and idiotic, and where it should begin with the crime and its punishment. But mostly affects the difference in view between the two issues: the denial needless to talk about it, so obvious is its inconsistency, but homophobia? Why the Taliban Vatican nostrani and all their minions should remain free to say that atrocities such as homosexuality is "unnatural," that gays are perverts and should be maintained even against their will, pointing out that those who would give them the most basic civil rights would be even against the laws of nature and / or God, basing their case on terms that often are the boundaries of racism real? With all that that entails, as the newspapers tell us quite regularly, suggesting that what leaps to the headlines is just the tip of the iceberg, but often is silent about what the homosexual and transsexual people have to suffer even today in theocracies Islamic countries and stronger Christian character.
We have just commemorated the deportation of Roman Jews from the ghetto on 16 October 1943, and every time we forget that the tragedy of the Holocaust have also found death homosexuals (and the Roma and other dissidents) would be a very good exercise for consistency and realism, as well as democracy, remember that racial discrimination - all - have the same gravity anywhere at any time. If it is desirable to have a clearer dividing line between freedom of opinion and propaganda of racist potentially (too often actively) el'incolumità dangerous for the freedom of certain 'categories' of citizens, then we must remember not to exclude anyone.
Incidentally, I am for freedom of expression, even the fools (as homophobic and negazonisti), but we can not ignore that some 'terms' have practical consequences different from the others, so that you could easily define 'propaganda', using a tremble in the last century had a very meaning left.
Perhaps the biggest problem today with respect to anti-Semitism and homophobia, which is an institutional bank even at some European governments. It 's true, however, create protected categories or unequal treatment of citizens is as pull a pickaxe to the liberal state, but in practice it ignores the consequences of religious propaganda against homosexuals, not for nothing that the Vatican and all the monotheistic religions have always opposed a law against homophobia (which exists in other countries) and understand why, as now also oppose the proposal of the rabbi of Rome. Want to have your hands-and language-free in both fields.
In short, this is not just verbal formulas negligible, because the words that open the way to the facts. It 's always been like that. We do not agree? Ok, give up the law against homophobia, but then also say no to the proposal for Pacifici, and also abolishes the Mancino law in its entirety.
The truth is that a truly liberal democracy and no difference between people working on it to get there on time, and if you need some 'corrections' to protect the physical safety and civil rights of some, and educate everyone mutual respect, Well then you have to do. Waiting for better times.
Friday, October 15, 2010
What Is Cost Of Good Weave
Catholic politicians 2.0
So the bishops would like to eventually move from threats to practice, after the ' appeal of the Pope in person for a renewed commitment of Catholics in political life, repeated several times in the last period: Cei, anticipates without revealing Mgr. Crusade (nomen omen), would in fact thinking of a 'training school for Catholic politicians' . That it seems almost a joke: there are not enough of Catholic politicians? For them obviously not, or you yet but not quite 'flexible'.
What the bishops to teach those who want to become a Catholic politician? How you hate discrimination and who does not want to be part of the flock? How do career with Communion and Liberation? All methods for increasing the assets of the Church and all its many privileges to give of all citizens? What will be the first bill, setting up eight per cent in place for eight thousand? The return of the Quirinal Palace to the Pope? The direct control cable (audio-video link) of all the apartments in the Vatican as part of the power Orwell's 1984?
By the way, we also give some advice to lorsignori. Future students of 'arrogance academy will immediately called the sad truth, namely that any national-Catholic or not-who wants to do politics in this unhappy country, if elected to take the chair and its benefits should go to the Quirinal Palace to swear on the Constitution of the Italian Republic in the hands of the President of the Republic, the Vatican and not to swear on the Bible in the hands of the pope. It seems obvious, but more than a current generation of Catholic politicians, not educated enough for the bishops, it ignores or pretends to ignore it; perjury, then. And there are written into the Constitution -With the blood of those who have beaten a dictatorship flanked by the predecessors of Msgr. Crusade-the fundamental principles of individual liberties and civil rights of men, it does not say that a moral and ethical-among many-that belongs only to some arbitrarily should be imposed on everyone, even those who do not share. 
So the bishops would like to eventually move from threats to practice, after the ' appeal of the Pope in person for a renewed commitment of Catholics in political life, repeated several times in the last period: Cei, anticipates without revealing Mgr. Crusade (nomen omen), would in fact thinking of a 'training school for Catholic politicians' . That it seems almost a joke: there are not enough of Catholic politicians? For them obviously not, or you yet but not quite 'flexible'.
Perhaps it would be to call a spade a spade, in accordance with the truth ("what you say is: yeah, no no" - Matthew 5:37), we try to give a name to the nth coherent operation Church of aggression of the civil life of the country: for example, might be called "Colonization of Parliament for the final death of democracy and the beginning of a new theocracy," COPAMODET. Sounds bad? Patience, because the substance is this.
What the bishops to teach those who want to become a Catholic politician? How you hate discrimination and who does not want to be part of the flock? How do career with Communion and Liberation? All methods for increasing the assets of the Church and all its many privileges to give of all citizens? What will be the first bill, setting up eight per cent in place for eight thousand? The return of the Quirinal Palace to the Pope? The direct control cable (audio-video link) of all the apartments in the Vatican as part of the power Orwell's 1984?
By the way, we also give some advice to lorsignori. Future students of 'arrogance academy will immediately called the sad truth, namely that any national-Catholic or not-who wants to do politics in this unhappy country, if elected to take the chair and its benefits should go to the Quirinal Palace to swear on the Constitution of the Italian Republic in the hands of the President of the Republic, the Vatican and not to swear on the Bible in the hands of the pope. It seems obvious, but more than a current generation of Catholic politicians, not educated enough for the bishops, it ignores or pretends to ignore it; perjury, then. And there are written into the Constitution -With the blood of those who have beaten a dictatorship flanked by the predecessors of Msgr. Crusade-the fundamental principles of individual liberties and civil rights of men, it does not say that a moral and ethical-among many-that belongs only to some arbitrarily should be imposed on everyone, even those who do not share.
And if even now, with the 'old generation' (the 1.0) to Catholic politicians- continuously pulled by the neck by the Vatican hierarchy, these principles are thoroughly rejected, what could combine a 'new generation' of politicians Catholics? Simple: to impose no additional legal and constitutional obstacles to their religion once and for all, could not help but bury this Constitution and write another one, of a confessional, finally placing the hypocrisy of the secular state, that there never was. Amen.
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Teeth Whitening Syringes
If we were all atheists (even atheists)
In his blog La Repubblica, Piergiorgio Odifreddi stresses that a statement is not unusual (in fact about Jose Saramago quotes) but that is not even a simple truism: nothing this upside down world where secularism and clericalism were played off the other one in the box, it is never too obvious. The statement in question is: if we were all atheists the world would be less violent, or otherwise-implied-a better world.
Now, the famous mathematician refers specifically to the absurd, yet another mini religious war that was unleashed after the idiot found that Christian fanatic who wanted to burn the Koran the Sept. 11, but out of the topical and looking at the problem further, I would say from a philosophical perspective, it is useful to clarify one thing: atheism (assuming he can speak in the singular and the plural rather, the simple fact that there are many forms of atheism as there are atheists) not only for those who do not have a religion and does not believe in anything transcendent.
In his blog La Repubblica, Piergiorgio Odifreddi stresses that a statement is not unusual (in fact about Jose Saramago quotes) but that is not even a simple truism: nothing this upside down world where secularism and clericalism were played off the other one in the box, it is never too obvious. The statement in question is: if we were all atheists the world would be less violent, or otherwise-implied-a better world.
Now, the famous mathematician refers specifically to the absurd, yet another mini religious war that was unleashed after the idiot found that Christian fanatic who wanted to burn the Koran the Sept. 11, but out of the topical and looking at the problem further, I would say from a philosophical perspective, it is useful to clarify one thing: atheism (assuming he can speak in the singular and the plural rather, the simple fact that there are many forms of atheism as there are atheists) not only for those who do not have a religion and does not believe in anything transcendent.
What many well-meaning Catholics and believers-in-general tirelessly to reproach declared atheists is that they replace the gods of the faithful with a few other gods, that is astrology, idolatry of consumerism and fashion, uncritical scientism, conformism, fideism proposal (see Soviet-style communism or even Berlusconi today), even atheism itself elevated to the dogmatic doctrine.
Ultimately, this criticism probably they do not always have a point, so many of those who call themselves atheists but they fall into the trap of the exchange of fetishes should review their definition of atheism. To that end, we could say that: the atheist is one who does not adhere to any preconceived ideology, religious or not, but it is also the one who is not satisfied with the telling of the story and the life that comes from giving pre-established channels to investigate and understand first hand how the world goes, is someone who poses the essential questions but does not indulge easier to answer without first verifying its content with detachment, is one who knows that "everything is relative", to quote Albert Einstein, in a word, the atheist is a free man in mind and in his vision of the world and social relations, and is aware of their freedom.
should have this kind of awareness (which will not come without commitment and perseverance, in a culture dominated by Catholicism) to fend without the effort and the avalanche of criticism stereotyped clichés (how many atheists in comparison with a believer who has been criticized because they are against the Church and religion then surely they are Stalinists?) chasing all over the atheist. And that invariably
Ultimately, this criticism probably they do not always have a point, so many of those who call themselves atheists but they fall into the trap of the exchange of fetishes should review their definition of atheism. To that end, we could say that: the atheist is one who does not adhere to any preconceived ideology, religious or not, but it is also the one who is not satisfied with the telling of the story and the life that comes from giving pre-established channels to investigate and understand first hand how the world goes, is someone who poses the essential questions but does not indulge easier to answer without first verifying its content with detachment, is one who knows that "everything is relative", to quote Albert Einstein, in a word, the atheist is a free man in mind and in his vision of the world and social relations, and is aware of their freedom.
should have this kind of awareness (which will not come without commitment and perseverance, in a culture dominated by Catholicism) to fend without the effort and the avalanche of criticism stereotyped clichés (how many atheists in comparison with a believer who has been criticized because they are against the Church and religion then surely they are Stalinists?) chasing all over the atheist. And that invariably
hours Odifreddi rain on the poor, who dared to say: "... typical of religions, and especially of the monotheistic religions ... who believes they have the absolute truth, relativism does not fight alone: \u200b\u200bit also arrogate the right to go and tell others what you would not want others to come and say to him. Basically, the problem of religious violence is all here. "
Obvious, but not granted.
Thursday, September 16, 2010
Feeling Of Swimming Leotard
XX Settembre, nostalgia
Next year will be celebrated with great pomp (League permitting) the 150th anniversary of the unification of Italy, but the XX September this year will be 140 years from completion and effective final unity of the nation, with the liberation of Rome from the yoke of the temporal power of the popes and the transfer of capital from Florence (made the following year). Unless the 'adjustments' that were a result of the last war, the physiognomy of the country by that time will not change any more.
Therefore, we is little hope that the proposed restoration of the festival (which it should be backed up with force and conviction by all the Italian lay) will be accepted: as just mentioned, we know that this time-The Republic writes - the agenda of the celebrations is decided by the mayor of Rome, the ex / post / neo-fascist Gianni Alemanno, together with leaders of the Vatican (in the person of Cardinal Bertone) and none other than the President of the Republic Giorgio Napolitano, or the highest authority of the state, that this very State, its Constitution and its secular identity should defend, rather than betray and sell out in the name of a supposed 'respect' the Church's position, again once set before History.
So there are good possibilities of having to attend in the coming days, the pitiful spectacle of a new revisionist celebration of our history, a new clean slate on the board of our collective consciousness, a new piece of the strategy of erasure of historical memory of this country, to please the increasingly overt theocratic longings Vatican and in accordance with the idea that ignorant people can be controlled better. 
Next year will be celebrated with great pomp (League permitting) the 150th anniversary of the unification of Italy, but the XX September this year will be 140 years from completion and effective final unity of the nation, with the liberation of Rome from the yoke of the temporal power of the popes and the transfer of capital from Florence (made the following year). Unless the 'adjustments' that were a result of the last war, the physiognomy of the country by that time will not change any more.
The xx September is our 'Independence Day', the first (the other is the April 25, also given that the unpopular right-wing majority, as it happens), liberation from Christian theocracy. E 'therefore an important date, but is no longer a national holiday, such as fascism abolished when the state has signed with the infamous Vatican Lateran Pacts. In their proposal-writing The Republic - two minority directors in the Capitol (Athos De Luca of the Democratic Party and the Civic List Gianluca Quadrana) asked to come back to be, because "Many years have passed since that September 20, 1870 in when Rome became the capital of the 'united Italy, the time is ripe to remove the' stigma imposed by fascism in this important anniversary of the Italian history that we need to know to new generations. "
We have a bunch of religious holidays, the entire calendar is completely consecrated to the memory and the celebrations of the Christian saints (many of which only assumed, it must be said, that read the true story c ' is to shudder for what they have done and why the Church has sanctified and chosen example to follow!), and only relatively few, rather than celebrate-remember-or at least the basic steps of secular history of this country. To celebrate is to remember the past to understand the present and thinking about the future, does not mean wasting time and money in useless ceremonies, than if it were not for that there should be no feast, starting with religious ones.
It
It
of water has passed under the bridge, and the fate would have it today to have the power to decide on the proposal of De Luca and Quadrini is a ruling class that has a lot to do just that with the regime by signing the Concordat with the Church of Rome has in fact betrayed the spirit of unity which took place on xx September 1870 and returned to the Church itself, as we have seen in the following decades until today, the temporal power that had lost that day, even hour exercised ' modern ', ie more or less hidden and fraudulent, that does not require having to expose the first person into the political arena. From "non expedit" then to the continuous interference in political life (and social) Italian today, that is what the Vatican should be a democracy and an independent foreign sovereign state, it is making a de facto restoration of the balance of power between the two states, fully supported by a counter right hand side of the Italian Parliament, which On the other hand had already tried to 'rehabilitate' the Republican fascists and refuses to ever-especially in the person of the President of the Council, its highest authority, to celebrate April 25 as well (except when you need to make yet another walkway making money with great cynicism about the tragedy of the earthquake Abbruzzese, see link above), and that fact stands out xx September two years ago, recalling the stage near the Porta Pia 19 papal Zouaves died on that day 140 years ago, while trying to defend what was left of a vicious dictatorship.
What is the situation now in Rome, if that is the capital of Italy is also famous shooters who opened the broken and closed the pope in the Vatican walls? In the capital more filthy and neglected in Europe, the right-wing mayor wants knock down a wall of the shrine Meier's Ara Pacis (this dell'archistar his aversion to the work I consider purely ideological, and killing wall of a pointless revenge on the former junta, in a different color) to see two churches from Tiber, and gave land to the Curia will be built where the first of 51 new churches well! With more and more existing ones are empty (which is why even this latest cast of 'concrete holy' is purely ideological, only serves to provide the Church other centers of propaganda and indoctrination) and the usual waste of public money for the benefit of a minority that could easily take advantage dell'ingente material heritage of his Church.
We understand that the Vatican is much better now that until the Renaissance: he has power, influence, privileges (such as exemption from all the shameful heritage of the CI on Roman and Italian), which is why they are happy and concelebrate cheerily putting them in front of a faux-secular Porta Pia. All with the complicity of the laity (STI) that the Italian xx September, as other instances of this kind, if interested in it too little, or nothing.
'pilot', try to organize (x exclude any 'excesses' secularists) this year's celebration is volersene as appropriate, as did all ancient pagan festivals and celebrations: religion attacks, swallow , assimilate and excrete something different from sol invictus become Christ's birth until September xx continues to devastate, delete, mark their territory.
Therefore, we is little hope that the proposed restoration of the festival (which it should be backed up with force and conviction by all the Italian lay) will be accepted: as just mentioned, we know that this time-The Republic writes - the agenda of the celebrations is decided by the mayor of Rome, the ex / post / neo-fascist Gianni Alemanno, together with leaders of the Vatican (in the person of Cardinal Bertone) and none other than the President of the Republic Giorgio Napolitano, or the highest authority of the state, that this very State, its Constitution and its secular identity should defend, rather than betray and sell out in the name of a supposed 'respect' the Church's position, again once set before History.
So there are good possibilities of having to attend in the coming days, the pitiful spectacle of a new revisionist celebration of our history, a new clean slate on the board of our collective consciousness, a new piece of the strategy of erasure of historical memory of this country, to please the increasingly overt theocratic longings Vatican and in accordance with the idea that ignorant people can be controlled better.
Thursday, September 9, 2010
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
Installation For Ranch Hand Grille Guards
rogue god is useless
Stephen Hawking, world-renowned astrophysicist, said God's intervention is unnecessary to explain the creation of the universe, due to a mechanism of 'spontaneous creation' following the law of gravity. Pending the full publication of the book (those are just so far out of advances) that contains this statement and which I have not seen the necessary skills, I can make some considerations 'incidental' personal, of another kind, but not less important.
The debate between creationists (now infiltrated everywhere, even in the most unlikely ) and evolutionists, since the discoveries in astrophysics have begun to grow at an exponential rate has moved from the planet Earth to the universe (universes ), but without change of nature and harshness of contrasts, and every time you move suddenly in the field of philosophical speculation, obviously more to contrast their theories to arrive, along with maybe a Theory of Everything finally demonstrated and shared. Eventuality, however, on which I would keep all my skepticism, even if it were possible, given the uncompromising nature of religious absolutism.
can understand the angry reactions rained down on the statements of Hawking, argue that because God is not necessary to create means to undermine and tear down the whole system of religious dogmatism, millennia of indoctrination passed off as granite certainties and all Fortunately these have led to an elite caste of priests around the world. As someone cleverly or stupidly melee plans, confusing philosophical theory and scientific observation (the mode of creation with the reason why it happened), then doing so perfidious insinuations about Hawking as to suggest the existence not a god-love such as that sold as good everywhere, but to evil gods that make the man, some men-particularly cruel, dishonest speculation about his physical condition (Hawking is dependent on a motorized chair to move from one machine and to speak because its progressive muscular atrophy).
To the question that arises before us (what good is a god?) The believer has a canned reply in his religion, which blocks the bud any attempt to further reasoning, and is so happy. We
(unbelievers), but we cut it short, give reason to astrophysics English and admit that yes, any god is essentially useless (but his followers very dangerous, as history teaches us), because the physics will give us sooner or then the answers we seek, or other applications with which to continue scientific research, but without the hassle of having to give ourselves an answer on the reason of all that exists and happens, which is a distinct philosophical speculation from scientific observation. Or we might conclude, if there is some kind of 'upper body', that it is following the 'creation', rather than a consequence of this cause.
I stop here, without pulling out tons of theological ruminations rigid and obtuse, to which generations of creationists have clung, and still do.
is: what if creationism (to return to a cosmic plan and the success of Hawking) was finally declassified in vision 'poetry' of the 'theory of everything'? Because it a religion with all its consequent dogmatism and fanaticism? Why spoil it? In the name of an alleged truth revealed? But what's the point?
Stephen Hawking, world-renowned astrophysicist, said God's intervention is unnecessary to explain the creation of the universe, due to a mechanism of 'spontaneous creation' following the law of gravity. Pending the full publication of the book (those are just so far out of advances) that contains this statement and which I have not seen the necessary skills, I can make some considerations 'incidental' personal, of another kind, but not less important.
The debate between creationists (now infiltrated everywhere, even in the most unlikely ) and evolutionists, since the discoveries in astrophysics have begun to grow at an exponential rate has moved from the planet Earth to the universe (universes ), but without change of nature and harshness of contrasts, and every time you move suddenly in the field of philosophical speculation, obviously more to contrast their theories to arrive, along with maybe a Theory of Everything finally demonstrated and shared. Eventuality, however, on which I would keep all my skepticism, even if it were possible, given the uncompromising nature of religious absolutism.
can understand the angry reactions rained down on the statements of Hawking, argue that because God is not necessary to create means to undermine and tear down the whole system of religious dogmatism, millennia of indoctrination passed off as granite certainties and all Fortunately these have led to an elite caste of priests around the world. As someone cleverly or stupidly melee plans, confusing philosophical theory and scientific observation (the mode of creation with the reason why it happened), then doing so perfidious insinuations about Hawking as to suggest the existence not a god-love such as that sold as good everywhere, but to evil gods that make the man, some men-particularly cruel, dishonest speculation about his physical condition (Hawking is dependent on a motorized chair to move from one machine and to speak because its progressive muscular atrophy).
To the question that arises before us (what good is a god?) The believer has a canned reply in his religion, which blocks the bud any attempt to further reasoning, and is so happy. We
(unbelievers), but we cut it short, give reason to astrophysics English and admit that yes, any god is essentially useless (but his followers very dangerous, as history teaches us), because the physics will give us sooner or then the answers we seek, or other applications with which to continue scientific research, but without the hassle of having to give ourselves an answer on the reason of all that exists and happens, which is a distinct philosophical speculation from scientific observation. Or we might conclude, if there is some kind of 'upper body', that it is following the 'creation', rather than a consequence of this cause.
But the non-believer, a fact that there is no old man with a beard and a white triangle on his head on any little cloud in front of him was a sea of \u200b\u200bmore opportunities to see the issue, leaving all to a different question not enough to observe and wonder at the terrible majesty of nature without trying to give it a name, a reassuring explanation, a familiar face, a mark that certifies the origin and an instruction manual? Why not just
to introduce the element of 'poetry' rather than wanting to put all costs throughout a foolish religious dogmatism (it takes a good dose of insanity to go by the philosophy and theology requirements to obtuse as not eating pork or cover their heads in church and other amenities that!) that not only does not explain anything in an objectively provable, but in fact trying to prevent even the explanations and evidence under the threat of eternal fire for the crime of 'lese-majeste divine'?
to introduce the element of 'poetry' rather than wanting to put all costs throughout a foolish religious dogmatism (it takes a good dose of insanity to go by the philosophy and theology requirements to obtuse as not eating pork or cover their heads in church and other amenities that!) that not only does not explain anything in an objectively provable, but in fact trying to prevent even the explanations and evidence under the threat of eternal fire for the crime of 'lese-majeste divine'?
Here's an example: the theories on the origins of complex life forms on Earth are moving ever more decisively toward the hypothesis that life-it-was brought here from another part of the system Sun 'on board' of an asteroid containing water in solid form (ice) and basic organic molecules dissolved in the water on the surface of our planet would then evolved over the course of geological time to the form we know, until recently -theory is not yet completely abandoned-it was thought as a vehicle instead of a comet. Now, applying a poetic vision (certainly not applicable on a scientific level) to a natural phenomenon well-explained, we could see that the shape of a comet in orbit close to the Sun is similar to that of a sperm, and the shape of a planet like the Earth to that of an egg. With the conclusion that the meteorite bombardment of Earth and Cometal in the ages will be felt in the eyes of a hypothetical observer a giant alien insemination in space, which in effect brought the conditions for life was born. E 'image' poetic 'is a natural phenomenon, lawful and not inconsistent with the scientific method as long as you keep in mind that in reality it is biology, physics and chemistry.
I stop here, without pulling out tons of theological ruminations rigid and obtuse, to which generations of creationists have clung, and still do.
is: what if creationism (to return to a cosmic plan and the success of Hawking) was finally declassified in vision 'poetry' of the 'theory of everything'? Because it a religion with all its consequent dogmatism and fanaticism? Why spoil it? In the name of an alleged truth revealed? But what's the point?
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
Gay Meeting Places In Peterborough Ontario
Nothing happened
September 2010.
And here's to stop and think.
For starters, note how the Bishop considers the sortie gheddafiana "a lack of sensitivity towards the Santopadre" , as if it were the sovereign and exclusive owner of the entire continent, but this shot deserves attention for another reason: because contains a (revived) and a policy statement (revived) a declaration of war.
Since the latter is highlighted (even if it is not so original) by the phrase:
in Playland as always-think-that no one notices. Calm, nothing happened. 
September 2010.
We have just returned from the sea, mountains, countryside, for those who could, otherwise we are here to melt in the sun, trying not to think about the impending return. Soundtrack of summer: Lady Gaga, Shakira, Irene Grandi, Berlusconi, Fini, Casini, Ratzinger, Bagnasco ... in short, the usual. Same mare, same script national-popular-political. Smash summer: "I do not play more, I'm leaving." Mina? No, Gianfranco Fini. That is: the fascist salute all'antiberlusconismo militant. Stunts that even the Cirque du Soleil.
And so the usual theater all say they want to avoid like the plague but in which then invariably all have a part: you resign, resignation, no, you hunt, you do not hunt, there is still the majority and go forward, not even there is more and then the floor to the will of the people (which it normally slam, as in every election expect the 'people' only ratifying decisions already taken in their houses full of money and whores). On the other hand resurrect zombies: ricicciano Veltroni and even Prodi. The new advancing.
We have been here all summer, I said, to melt in the sun, without any of those to whom we pay the salary (it is not indifference, it is a fact) they were employed seriously the fact that maybe we will not find in September more our job , if we had, or the fact that for many single-income families by the end of the month is now closer to the beginning of the month at the end, little things like that, well, because we do not have problems serious as theirs, they can not soddisfarre all aspiring showgirls who crave a folding seat in the main lounge of power. And what would
republic, this? The second? But please!
worry, I said, nothing happened.
So it fell to the dictator of the moment and full recovery in August to shake a little water in a climate by the end of an empire depressing squalor.
Gaddafi and his 'Amazons', his tent, and even his horses Berbers, a kitsch festival a few times and lout as he had seen during a state visit. Dictators peasants-here-for some reason are always welcome. Among
miraculous conversions of comely young women (paid to the presence and choreography) and kissing and backslapping dictator with ours, the shot effect, " Islam is the religion of Europe. Augh, I said . "And then asked for an avalanche of money by threatening to support the invasion by a continental army of migrants, a ghost summoned by Gaddafi probably first of all for cash in the EU: a real extortion no doubt about it. All found adequate response from ' Europe (certainly not from Italy, the Libyan dictator who merely act as a shoulder).
First reaction, instinctive and dismissive: it lacking only this!
But then read, evaluate, weigh and weigh the reaction, just arrived from the acrobats of the buildings: all normal, I would say, shoot the Lega, the resentment of Catholic lobbies finally ... you come-drum roll-in that of the Vatican state, speaking through the Secretary of Propaganda Fide, Archbishop Robert Sarah Guinean.
And so the usual theater all say they want to avoid like the plague but in which then invariably all have a part: you resign, resignation, no, you hunt, you do not hunt, there is still the majority and go forward, not even there is more and then the floor to the will of the people (which it normally slam, as in every election expect the 'people' only ratifying decisions already taken in their houses full of money and whores). On the other hand resurrect zombies: ricicciano Veltroni and even Prodi. The new advancing.
We have been here all summer, I said, to melt in the sun, without any of those to whom we pay the salary (it is not indifference, it is a fact) they were employed seriously the fact that maybe we will not find in September more our job , if we had, or the fact that for many single-income families by the end of the month is now closer to the beginning of the month at the end, little things like that, well, because we do not have problems serious as theirs, they can not soddisfarre all aspiring showgirls who crave a folding seat in the main lounge of power. And what would
republic, this? The second? But please!
worry, I said, nothing happened.
So it fell to the dictator of the moment and full recovery in August to shake a little water in a climate by the end of an empire depressing squalor.
Gaddafi and his 'Amazons', his tent, and even his horses Berbers, a kitsch festival a few times and lout as he had seen during a state visit. Dictators peasants-here-for some reason are always welcome. Among
miraculous conversions of comely young women (paid to the presence and choreography) and kissing and backslapping dictator with ours, the shot effect, " Islam is the religion of Europe. Augh, I said . "And then asked for an avalanche of money by threatening to support the invasion by a continental army of migrants, a ghost summoned by Gaddafi probably first of all for cash in the EU: a real extortion no doubt about it. All found adequate response from ' Europe (certainly not from Italy, the Libyan dictator who merely act as a shoulder).
First reaction, instinctive and dismissive: it lacking only this!
But then read, evaluate, weigh and weigh the reaction, just arrived from the acrobats of the buildings: all normal, I would say, shoot the Lega, the resentment of Catholic lobbies finally ... you come-drum roll-in that of the Vatican state, speaking through the Secretary of Propaganda Fide, Archbishop Robert Sarah Guinean.
And here's to stop and think.
For starters, note how the Bishop considers the sortie gheddafiana "a lack of sensitivity towards the Santopadre" , as if it were the sovereign and exclusive owner of the entire continent, but this shot deserves attention for another reason: because contains a (revived) and a policy statement (revived) a declaration of war.
Since the latter is highlighted (even if it is not so original) by the phrase:
"the true danger to the Europeans relativism, the lack of attention to the faith, the weakness of religion, indifference to the sacred. Mali, which are becoming so clear now too. These are the real 'enemies' of our faith, which could create fertile land for any future Islamic penetration throughout Europe. "
Shaken by the Vatican, the bogeyman of 'Islamic penetration' would seem a red herring (although, of course, a possibility is far from impossible in practice), a sham not so surprising when you consider that soon after Sarah reveals and declares no chance of misunderstanding what is the true goal of freedom of thought. The enemy, to fight at the cost of an alliance with the devil. And here the devil-the-first, unfortunate statement, that programmatic beyond the feeble protests against the Libyan dictator, he persists in offering to Islam (with whom Gaddafi really has not much to do) alliance against the objective, the common enemy, which is the one above. Basically most of the instances brought forward by the two religions have in common: the secular nature of burial institutions, repression of homosexuality and women's freedom, indoctrination continued from primary school level, control of social, public and private, to the minutest details and employment of power politically and economically. Meanwhile, the rest you can also come to an agreement, perhaps by either party on Friday that Sunday, that's the problem? But then, as all the chickens come home to roost, inevitably would lead to a clash between opposing proselytism. Why would a god, whatever, have to have precedence over others. Thus it is written-like.
Realistically: under the dome is insists on playing with fire (our skin) if it was this partnership that really works, and that the common enemies of religion can be defeated, what we expect next? A new holy war? The common enemy disappeared, how it organizes the territory between Islam and Christianity? How does one live in a continent that has always said he would 'Christian roots'?
I can not stress this enough: this is why Europe is urgently needed, and an Italy-secular, equidistant between religions and ideologies, freedom from that kind of conditioning, with strong institutions, as far as possible impervious to pressure lobbying religious, guaranteeing equality and freedom of individual citizens. Paradoxically, in the interests of religions and ideologies (and that's why the battle for secularism - secularism for them-should also be taken up by believers, at least those 'reasonable'), which free space may continue to exist without the risk that one may take precedence over the others. Certainly not in the interest of the non-believer and a citizen would like to stay with their freedom intact, and sees the danger in the push-all of those who 'opposed to those who seek the alliance of absolutism, believed to be able to defend against extremism using Another extreme, albeit of a different kind, until the inevitable crash or-at best-suppression of their civil rights in the name of a covenant or a war between the cruel and perverse. We're hunting
between two fires: it is a real risk, and must be addressed and averted until we have time. But instead
I can not stress this enough: this is why Europe is urgently needed, and an Italy-secular, equidistant between religions and ideologies, freedom from that kind of conditioning, with strong institutions, as far as possible impervious to pressure lobbying religious, guaranteeing equality and freedom of individual citizens. Paradoxically, in the interests of religions and ideologies (and that's why the battle for secularism - secularism for them-should also be taken up by believers, at least those 'reasonable'), which free space may continue to exist without the risk that one may take precedence over the others. Certainly not in the interest of the non-believer and a citizen would like to stay with their freedom intact, and sees the danger in the push-all of those who 'opposed to those who seek the alliance of absolutism, believed to be able to defend against extremism using Another extreme, albeit of a different kind, until the inevitable crash or-at best-suppression of their civil rights in the name of a covenant or a war between the cruel and perverse. We're hunting
between two fires: it is a real risk, and must be addressed and averted until we have time. But instead
in Playland as always-think-that no one notices. Calm, nothing happened.
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Belkin Tunebase Fm Transmitter For Zune.
Bottle Ratzinger
It is said that in 1910, during the passage of Halley's comet hysteria broke out everywhere a-false-information related to the tail of the comet, believed to consist of poison gas, would intersect Earth's orbit precisely when passing through our planet, causing the disappearance of all forms of life. As always happens when someone carries on disasters such as this thesis, for example, every millennium and is currently awaiting the 2012 with the alleged prediction of the Mayan calendar end of the world, including those who fall for there are those who take it easy and expect more or less peacefully on the last day, those who are preparing spiritually and then there are those who took advantage, by unscrupulous vulture good. Exactly a century ago, among others, distinguished Michelin, which made advertising his 'bottle of fresh air' (see image above, taken from Astronomy magazine Coelum ), and only those who had it-this was the thesis-could 'breathe freely', would have survived escaping to the 'pestiferous miasma' of the comet.
It is said that in 1910, during the passage of Halley's comet hysteria broke out everywhere a-false-information related to the tail of the comet, believed to consist of poison gas, would intersect Earth's orbit precisely when passing through our planet, causing the disappearance of all forms of life. As always happens when someone carries on disasters such as this thesis, for example, every millennium and is currently awaiting the 2012 with the alleged prediction of the Mayan calendar end of the world, including those who fall for there are those who take it easy and expect more or less peacefully on the last day, those who are preparing spiritually and then there are those who took advantage, by unscrupulous vulture good. Exactly a century ago, among others, distinguished Michelin, which made advertising his 'bottle of fresh air' (see image above, taken from Astronomy magazine Coelum ), and only those who had it-this was the thesis-could 'breathe freely', would have survived escaping to the 'pestiferous miasma' of the comet.
The mechanism is the usual one, which has always worked for ever and ever: you put around false information, intentionally or not, or used the psychosis of the time and derive profit from the fear aroused in the people to get more obedience, and to maintain and increase the privileges, wealth and power.
Among the masters of this tactic has always distinguished the Catholic Church, which indeed it is the most obvious example, because the entire system of religion that advocates (along with other monotesimi and a host of smaller religions) based on 'hope' of 'salvation'. The 'pestiferous miasma' of this century (not to mention those of the past), then, would be: ethical relativism, the society in which God is marginalized, materialism, secularism, etc., as by thousands of photocopies of statements-suasantità and submitted everything that in any way jeopardize the privileges and political power of lorsignori.
As the priests of every religion and ideology of the past, while their attitude is to provide front-alone in the world, hope and salvation of souls, the hidden reality is that the continuing enrichment derives great benefit from the catastrophe of the above.
As the priests of every religion and ideology of the past, while their attitude is to provide front-alone in the world, hope and salvation of souls, the hidden reality is that the continuing enrichment derives great benefit from the catastrophe of the above.
Not surprisingly then, so it's logical matter, the results of scientific studies according to which the unbeliever is smarter than the average believer. Without pride, non-believers are the true hope of mankind, Bottle against Ratzinger.
Monday, July 12, 2010
Alexandria Body Sugaring In North Carolina
will be the heat ... but we are witnessing the triumph of the grotesque "Italian".
The European Court of Human Rights has begun to examine the use of the Italian government, supported by most democracies 'liberal and advanced' of Europe, it will take several weeks to work and then come to a conclusion , we know that even if the sentence at the end of 2009 will not be confirmed, however, observed: while the pope-salesman tries to 'sell' the most diverse institutions and at least theoretically incompatible with spirituality (But the money was not the "devil's dung"?), The crucifix is \u200b\u200bdefended and supported by more and more unlikely characters and associations pulled up out of nowhere: the Freemasonry, the Northern League with all its inconsistencies of the past and This (the rites of the Celtic 'god Po', the incitement to sink the boats of migrants, the scripted racist type rubber gloves to get on the bus also used by immigrants), before which no hierarchy vaticali it is readily produced in any sentence at least as it is produced in the paradoxical praise about "defending Christian values" made recently by the Northern League themselves, and then AC secularists like the President of Camera Gianfranco Fini, and so on. While the same continues to be crucified imposed anywhere and everywhere with frenzied bestial instincts of demarcation of the territory.
How much waste of resources and intellect: the only thing close to the truth and common sense, do not say "enlightened" but at least clever that the Catholic hierarchy could do was say something like, "although the cross off the wall will remain in the hearts of the faithful is "and stop there. And they would have won once.
But they have not said.
Meanwhile at the home of the chief butler Master (granted luxurious home with Christian charity to the needy by Propaganda Fide) you can dine happily among people who nor should they meet by chance on the street, beyond the ritual of the tart partitocratica memory table to the subversive (that I know the structure of the executive and legislative seats are decided in the total institutional transparency and involvement of the voters, not hidden as precisely the Freemasons) also participates in a representative of a foreign state, the usual: it seems that the anointed of the Lord himself has asked for help to the Secretary of State (Vatican) Tarcisio Bertone to the downloading instead of Fini and his loyalists is taken by the party investigated the multi-Catholic Taliban cohabiting Pierferdy Casini. What you do maneuvers low cuisine to change the majority in parliament according to the conveniences, the face of voters, as I said above-is-a dreary habit that unfortunately no one outraged, but also participating in a cardinal and so blatantly does nothing but close the circle, the face of those who say that the Church does not interfere in Italian politics.
In all this, in the asylum Italy, the horizon is even a secret Masonic lodge all-new, updated and improved: the P3 . We look forward to come out a new list of affiliates, to count how many clergy are part of it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)