Pap Tests Shave Before

The Higgs boson in the dissemination of newspapers

From "Corriere della sera" 21/12/2010

The Higgs. Carneades, who was he? The mass of people do not know and rightly so. But the newspapers, they, yes, they know and according to their informative news and this same truth from time to time, in correspondence with the experiments at CERN and write sensational headlines, like "the hunt for the Higgs, or the God particle ". God particle not in the sense of a possessive genitive, as created by God, but in the subjective sense, as it is the particle that creates God, that is to say that 'the origin of matter, with the implication sorridevole, alluring and sensational which means "read with care, be careful, soon we will share the extraordinary news that God does not exist, because all 'source c' is the Higgs particle that gives matter at all."

Higgs explained that the term comes from the name of the Indian physicist Satyendra Nath Bose who has studied elementary particles, which are divided into bosons and fermions. The physical Higgs in 1964, while strolling on the Scottish hills said to have had a great idea (one big idea ), suggested the 'existence of a new elementary particle, that at all today', has not yet been detected in experiments particle acceleration, but that is sought with great dedication by the huge superacceleratore LHC in Geneva. Recent experiments (October 2010) have begun to give important results are on track, but not decisive in determining the existence of irrefutable Higgs. The large machine was switched off December 6, 2010 for a two-month maintenance and upgrade of technology used. The energy level reached by which we tried the Higgs boson was 7 Tev (a Tev is equivalent to one million electron volts). When will rekindle enough, perhaps, bring it to 7.1 Tev to get many other great results. But if they are not, the car can climb to power Maximum of 14 TeV. In all this, the 600 Italian physicists, the world's most important in the field of high energies, have a significance both in record-breaking 'invention of technologies in both the design and direction. At the head of the four experiments, involving about 6000 scientists from around the world, are all Italian physicists. Their purpose is to reproduce the conditions of 'universe a split second after the big bang from which everything originates. This is beautiful, great and positive perspective. But beauty is not what made the 'editor of a text on the physical Higgs Leon Max Lederman. This Nobel Prize winner spoke of "goddamn particle" for his elusive character, the elusive search tools. All 'publisher did not like the name, which changed to the "God particle", thus giving the' start to the sensationalism of the newspapers. Higgs was concerned that this might offend religious people and was disappointed. For newspapers and instead is left with enthusiasm "the God particle." But is the purpose of the CERN scientists have finally confirmed the Higgs boson certainly do not offend religious people. They know and just with the scientific findings which science operates and can operate only in 'immanent, and that no scientific discovery as Galileo thought the believer can never undermine the transcendent. There are different orders and any negative inference, each application of finite categories to 'infinite transcendence is not possible. Higgs can sleep soundly without fear of offending someone.

What Has Happen To Nick Berry

E 'nato a secular atheist child

GROUPS APPEAL TO ITALIAN

On 29 January, Modena, has run together a group of Italian associations, decided to take a step towards the unity of secular forces, often missing. The desire to join

stems from the fact that, like it or not, we face great challenges. Challenges raised against the secular nature of institutions, attacked on every front and on every issue: from the principle of the bioassay autoderminazione by Law 194 to assisted reproduction, the use of contraceptives, the pill RU486, the necessary reform of family law in defense of schools of the Republic. And many others could be added.

Although the lay Italian association experiences a moment of historical weakness - and nobody needs hide - no doubt Italy is in many ways, a largely secular society, as evidenced by several statistics. Each subject lay in fact, the Italian and the Italians showed an independence of opinion by religious dogma and the statements of the parties that bodes well for the present and the future.

The vast majority of secular people are our strength and we wish them and all over the country and we need to talk. Of course to defend the rights gained, but also to extend them.

Moving from defense to the proposal, it is our intention, as advancing only defends what is already acquired.

We therefore decided to test us, in a practical and sincere. We believe that the urgency is more relevant today and this in 2011, oppose the passage of legislation against the freedom-based bioassays, which violates the constitutional right to self-therapeutic, enshrined in Article 32 and confirmed by the international conventions signed by ' Italy. On this issue concrete measure our desire for unity of secular forces. If, as we hope, the outcome is positive, then we will have a new tool to intervene on all issues concerning the rights, individual and civil rights.

For these reasons, we invite all Italian associations that recognize the principle of secularism to join the LAY NATIONAL COORDINATION .

Cinzia Cecconi Maurizio Gori
spokesmen

Nicotine Patch Blister

manga studio

first round brush manga studio debut
.. the result is not 'na
great thing, however, the program makes appalladefogo!

Heat Pump Aux Light Hook Up

Air Spring

Main Event Boxing Gloves

All Nintendo Events Coming Up

A bit pattern of nature 'of clarity

reviving the study of mathematics, physics, philosophy that we did not evil is a return to some 'clarity on the concepts of finite and infinite, as frequently in the press, returns to the question whether the' universe is finite or infinite.

Let's start close to us. L 'experience tells us that a part is equal (in terms equipotent specialist) to everything, and everything in our experiential world is over. This is a first clear, easy to conquer, because it's part of what we experience. That part was equal to all, as leading to say the solution of certain problems, it was impossible problem posed by the disciple of Galileo, Bonaventura Cavalieri. But the logic of mathematics, Galileo already solve the problem, discovered that the part is equal to the whole. Infinite sets in the part is equal to the whole. So the mathematical logic wins the 'infinite. For the mathematical logic' exists and there is infinite because his mental costruzone does not lead to any contradictions. Therefore a first response now sure the 'we have: the' infinite exists. Thanks to mathematical logic we could do some 'clarity. Now we can use the language property. So when we talk about finite and infinite we can and must be accurate to say we refer to as infinity. The 'infinity exists in mathematical logic as God exists in mathematical logic. He has proved his theorem by Kurt Godel. But we are at the same problem: the 'infinity of mathematical logic is not the' absolute infinite. On this level the party is not really equal to the whole. No calculation of logic, no scientific discovery can never make the leap from 'immanent to the transcendent. The 'infinity of infinite sets is not the' absolute infinity which is breathed totaliter . Therefore, even the most advanced scientific discoveries at the borders and beyond our universe can not refer more than the 'immanent. Experimental science, the discoveries have every right to tell us that the 'universe is finite, because they operate only in' immanent. The scientist, a modern Ulysses, passing all the Hercules 'columns, and can only just discovered the' immanent without being able to deny the transcendent. The 'infinite absolute tutt' other history of all 'others for which only in retrospect, philosophically, we may think.

How Long For Std Test Results

A contribution to the Courtyard of the Gentiles

Tomorrow, February 12, will finally be opened in Bologna called the Courtyard of the Gentiles, which was announced several times by Msgr. Gianfranco Ravasi: the intent of the founding of the latter (which takes its name from the court that existed in the temple of Jerusalem where the people were "other" than elected) should be a space in which the Catholic Church is confronted with non- believers.

Judging by recent statements by influential members of the Catholic clergy and specifically of who was involved in the preparation of the event ( here a selection of 'pearls' ecclesial and clerical thread about atheists and atheism, and the sources of the quotations in this article), however, the initiative has the air to be a sort of debate make-up, plus a spectacular event that a true propaganda-peer comparison: in fact the Church, more and more worried by the advance of relativism and secularism of Western society, is committed tirelessly in 'recruitment campaign' with little risk as possible, and Bologna for the conference has been chosen with care stakeholders, fishing mostly in secure fence so-called "devout atheists" (not will first Massimo Cacciari, who is one of the most authoritative exponents, while we know nothing about the participation by Marcello Pera, who understands the pope for having collaborated several times with him) rather than in the secular world of associations and atheists and agnostics, to arrive at the summit to define the contempt UAAR (actually the largest and most influential membership atheist Italian) "folk" gimmick that is most likely to avoid a confrontation is not tamed.

A comparison of peer-l 'can-only assumes knowledge and mutual respect, and should be done only when citizens and non-believers and believers will have the same level of civil rights and individual liberties, a situation far removed to be carried out in some European democracies, including our country first.

But we give credit to Msgr. Ravasi and his staff, pending the outcome of the event and sincerely hope that what will come out first of all is the end of the denial of the existence of atheists (and atheism), the refund to them the full dignity of every human person deserves beyond their beliefs, and even the official declaration of the end of hostilities against Catholic atheists and interference in lawmaking by national parliaments. We believe at this point On this occasion we want to make our modest contribution to the debate in the form of a list of essential (to Nick Hornby), briefly and in short order, of what was essential was finally taken and placed at the base of the debate, from Bologna onwards: 1

atheism is not a danger to society and the Church, and is not threatening to the point of having the ability - and intentions - to destroy one or the other or "disfigured man and creation," as feared by Camillo Ruini in an interview with Corriere del 2 December 2009 by Pope Ratzinger and the hearing to the diplomatic corps accredited to the Holy See January 12, 2010;

2 is not true that atheists are in favor of eugenics and of scientism outright regardless, maybe raised to think like religious, even an atheist has his own spirituality and love for the 'life', which ignore religion;

3 we can not say that atheists do not know God 'are not fully human' (Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor interviewed by the BBC in May 2009), or who are unable to grasp the 'humanity and love of neighbor, as he elegantly suggested Mr. Ratzinger in person at the General Audience of December 2, 2009 and in the homily of January 2, 2010;

4 can not be said that there atheism, or that it is impossible to be an atheist, or simply that atheism is the "rejection" of the existence of God, because this assumes that the existence of god is real and proven. E 'instead start from the well for which some claim that there is anything that has to try it, not those who deny it, which even then would have the burden of proof of non existence, a paradox unacceptable

5 is not true that atheists have no type of morality, or which are-according to the common misconception-beings without inhibitions and lack of respect for this neighbor, devoted to all kinds of criminal brutality, at best, that their life has no "direction, a purpose '(always Ruini, in the interview above), it is not true that atheists, by failing to a deity as a reference, rely on surrogates such as astrology or vices such as gambling, or create other types of idols, as if it must necessarily fill a void. Participants in the Courtyard of the Gentiles should take note of reality to understand it: there is no single ethical and moral one, the Christian is not the only possible and is not a priori be considered the best ever, and a man can achieve peacefully their aspirations even without a god on the horizon;

6 atheists do not share responsibility for the massacres committed by dictatorships "materialistic" of the twentieth century, with which atheism has no relevance: it is commonly cite Stalin, Hitler (Speech Ratzinger during his visit to Britain, September 2010) and Fidel Castro (though it leaves out - who knows why - Augusto Pinochet);

7 atheism is not a dogmatic ideology . There are actually many forms of atheism as there are atheists. Relativism feared by the Church is not negative in itself, but rather a resource that enriches and increases both individual companies in a variety of successful approaches to reality, while still ensuring the existence of religious ideologies;

8 do not need (heaven forbid) an 'alliance between monotheistic ' defeat ' atheism, as advocated by the Minister Foreign Affairs Franco Frattini in an article for L'Osservatore Romano, October 22, 2010, which sounds almost like an incitement to persecution of atheists, we also face a lot of attention to the use of biblical quotations, it is not prudent for example, that the Pope, at this time of witch hunts, stressing that there is need for the "stick and crook, to ward off wild animals from the herd" (celebration Eucharistic June 12, 2010);

And good job to all the defendants in the Courtyard.

Vintage Girdles And Stockings

Occam's razor

Occam's razor, postulated by the English monaco William of Occam in the fourteenth century, is a methodological principle according to which the same elements of the solution to a problem that is simpler or more reasonable or it is useless to complicate the solution of a problem by adding more complex assumptions than necessary.

The principle was not accepted uncritically by the whole world of philosophy and science, for example, there is those who oppose it arguing that its staff is the refusal or inability to accept an uncomfortable reality, or the complexities of nature in its entirety, and this criticism is good to see you for even the basics of creation: it is very easy to understand (and easy to accept, because it requires no effort or research reason) an explanation of the existence of all its complexity and with the help of an agent whose creator's original intentions and its origin is unknown (but should be accepted without criticism), but in reality this does nothing but move the problem up one step higher: Who created the creator? If the logic was part of the cultural heritage of religions, the principle address the problem in a flash.

Occam's razor, for which he saw his postulate is accused of heresy by the Church of Pope John XXII, is applicable in a variety of situations ranging from small daily problems to the great question of the existence of the transcendent, but in fact the principle also applies to the world of scientific research, for example in the dispute over the composition of the universe and the laws that govern it: the existence of dark matter (or 'dark matter' theory backed up by some comments but not yet definitively proven) is not 'is no unanimity in the scientific community, and to explain the movement of the largest cosmic structures, ie galaxies and clusters of galaxies, a minority This has theorized that Newtonian physics might have different laws depending on the cosmic scale investigating, this theory called MOND (modified Newtonian Dynamic) seems an unnecessary complication to the more in light of the existence of dark matter, or-changing point of view-it is pointless to the latter theory. The debate is still open, although it seems they go to great strides towards proving the existence of dark matter.

in Robert Zemeckis' Contact of 1997 (adapted from a novel by Carl Sagan) is an excellent application of the principle in both fields, the scientific and theological. The two protagonists are a theologian who has great influence the White House and a research scientist of SETI (Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence, finding extraterrestrial intelligence, a program that really does exist): the first, of course, can not explain the existence of god with evidence, not the second may prove his contact with an alien civilization evolved because his instruments have not made anything.

A lesson to be learned from all this is that it is good to deal with research in all fields of human knowledge with humility and without arrogance, and that we must always be ready to challenge their case, without making a matter of unquestionable principles.

Already published here .

Can I Use Neufchatel Instead Of Cream Cheese

The leadership of' arts

The power of beauty!

Bulldog Remote Car Start Device

Crosses in the mountains, or how to mark the territory of the method

among readers who loves and frequents the mountain will not have been able to avoid notice that the peaks above our valleys svettino many Christian crosses, placed to dominate the valleys below, or hidden, locations visible only after a long and arduous journey along the paths of high altitude. Iron, concrete or wood, more or less visible but still intrusive, 'artificial', clearly a symbol of a party to the mountain-that-place (even if it were considered that arises from the natural movement of continental plates) work is not aware of upper holder of the symbol but, besides being of everyone, believers or not, however, is the place 'spiritual' or metaphysical par excellence

"Every visitor to the mountain, past and present Motivated by intent or wilderness recreation and leisure, found in the upstream core value in many ways a mystic, resulting primarily from the inevitable, majestic natural beauty of the mountains, from being a sphere of purity, still devoid of incontaminatezza certain ugliness of human civilization more senseless, from every place absolute peak, high above the world and beyond which there is only the vastness of the sky; the same plan from the climber ascending to the summit has often been interpreted in ascetic (same etymological root, for that matter), the elevation from the daily routine to that of pure high altitudes. Without in any way stretch out to supernatural visions, divine and thus religious, there is no doubt that the essence of the mountain vibrates and touches the deepest chords of the human soul, and springs from feelings and emotions of absolute humanity, someone called the mountains " cathedrals of the earth ", to emphasize a sacred absolute, absolutely secular and well contrasted with any other set of religious origin, with the mountains as beautiful temples praising the beauty of nature in general and of our world, "

to use the words of the writer Luca Rota .

habit to 'mark' territory, as some wild animals with their smell, is typical Catholic culture dates back to ancient times, but those times have changed and the imposition of party symbols is no longer universally advocated or tolerated only by those who make the mountain even his 'profession' or his life: the question In fact, it was also placed inside the CAI, the Italian Alpine Club, and the debate has reached peaks that would drive controversy, for example, some members to return the card without many regrets, while a Swiss mountain guide has a cross sawn without ceremony or remorse, and even here in some crosses planted with emphasis (and with the helicopter) Dolomites 'disappear' mysteriously, leaving only the holes of the bolts between the shock of innocent villagers. It comes, inevitably, to the provocation of some intelligent guides who in 2005 brought a statue of Buddha on top of Pizzo shovel. About

plant crosses in the mountains is not even remotely consider that his abuse is, an arbitrary act, misappropriation of a common good, as does (fortunately only in words) the reigning pope, and as did his predecessor, who during his summer holidays in Val d'Aosta, which does not glorify God's work that it would create 'such great beauty'. It 'true that a cross between a ski lift, which is abandoned or running, there is little doubt which creates the most damage to the alpine environment (Ratzinger has never been to see Pila summer?), But apart from the fact that a battle does not exclude the other, a chair lift is not a symbol of an ideology (if not that of cement and speculators at all costs) for discriminating those who do not share.

To all these objections to replicate it ends with the usual self-destructive mechanism (involuntary?) Scaling the value of the symbol-crucifix: a cross that annoying?, respond after trying to argue the alleged universality of the symbol.
So you can not give that right to Reinhold Messner, when he says that would be fair to remove all symbols from the mountains: "When you reach the top as they used to do just once, to build a cairn of stones." And stop. In order not to make religious war territory of yet.




Already published here .