Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Gay Meeting Places In Peterborough Ontario

Nothing happened



September 2010.
We have just returned from the sea, mountains, countryside, for those who could, otherwise we are here to melt in the sun, trying not to think about the impending return. Soundtrack of summer: Lady Gaga, Shakira, Irene Grandi, Berlusconi, Fini, Casini, Ratzinger, Bagnasco ... in short, the usual. Same mare, same script national-popular-political. Smash summer: "I do not play more, I'm leaving." Mina? No, Gianfranco Fini. That is: the fascist salute all'antiberlusconismo militant. Stunts that even the Cirque du Soleil.
And so the usual theater all say they want to avoid like the plague but in which then invariably all have a part: you resign, resignation, no, you hunt, you do not hunt, there is still the majority and go forward, not even there is more and then the floor to the will of the people (which it normally slam, as in every election expect the 'people' only ratifying decisions already taken in their houses full of money and whores). On the other hand resurrect zombies: ricicciano Veltroni and even Prodi. The new advancing.

We have been here all summer, I said, to melt in the sun, without any of those to whom we pay the salary (it is not indifference, it is a fact) they were employed seriously the fact that maybe we will not find in September more our job , if we had, or the fact that for many single-income families by the end of the month is now closer to the beginning of the month at the end, little things like that, well, because we do not have problems serious as theirs, they can not soddisfarre all aspiring showgirls who crave a folding seat in the main lounge of power. And what would
republic, this? The second? But please!
worry, I said, nothing happened.

So it fell to the dictator of the moment and full recovery in August to shake a little water in a climate by the end of an empire depressing squalor.
Gaddafi and his 'Amazons', his tent, and even his horses Berbers, a kitsch festival a few times and lout as he had seen during a state visit. Dictators peasants-here-for some reason are always welcome. Among
miraculous conversions of comely young women (paid to the presence and choreography) and kissing and backslapping dictator with ours, the shot effect, " Islam is the religion of Europe. Augh, I said . "And then asked for an avalanche of money by threatening to support the invasion by a continental army of migrants, a ghost summoned by Gaddafi probably first of all for cash in the EU: a real extortion no doubt about it. All found adequate response from ' Europe (certainly not from Italy, the Libyan dictator who merely act as a shoulder).

First reaction, instinctive and dismissive: it lacking only this!
But then read, evaluate, weigh and weigh the reaction, just arrived from the acrobats of the buildings: all normal, I would say, shoot the Lega, the resentment of Catholic lobbies finally ... you come-drum roll-in that of the Vatican state, speaking through the Secretary of Propaganda Fide, Archbishop Robert Sarah Guinean.

And here's to stop and think.
For starters, note how the Bishop considers the sortie gheddafiana "a lack of sensitivity towards the Santopadre" , as if it were the sovereign and exclusive owner of the entire continent, but this shot deserves attention for another reason: because contains a (revived) and a policy statement (revived) a declaration of war.
Since the latter is highlighted (even if it is not so original) by the phrase:
"the true danger to the Europeans relativism, the lack of attention to the faith, the weakness of religion, indifference to the sacred. Mali, which are becoming so clear now too. These are the real 'enemies' of our faith, which could create fertile land for any future Islamic penetration throughout Europe. "
Shaken by the Vatican, the bogeyman of 'Islamic penetration' would seem a red herring (although, of course, a possibility is far from impossible in practice), a sham not so surprising when you consider that soon after Sarah reveals and declares no chance of misunderstanding what is the true goal of freedom of thought. The enemy, to fight at the cost of an alliance with the devil. And here the devil-the-first, unfortunate statement, that programmatic beyond the feeble protests against the Libyan dictator, he persists in offering to Islam (with whom Gaddafi really has not much to do) alliance against the objective, the common enemy, which is the one above. Basically most of the instances brought forward by the two religions have in common: the secular nature of burial institutions, repression of homosexuality and women's freedom, indoctrination continued from primary school level, control of social, public and private, to the minutest details and employment of power politically and economically. Meanwhile, the rest you can also come to an agreement, perhaps by either party on Friday that Sunday, that's the problem? But then, as all the chickens come home to roost, inevitably would lead to a clash between opposing proselytism. Why would a god, whatever, have to have precedence over others. Thus it is written-like.
Realistically: under the dome is insists on playing with fire (our skin) if it was this partnership that really works, and that the common enemies of religion can be defeated, what we expect next? A new holy war? The common enemy disappeared, how it organizes the territory between Islam and Christianity? How does one live in a continent that has always said he would 'Christian roots'?

I can not stress this enough: this is why Europe is urgently needed, and an Italy-secular, equidistant between religions and ideologies, freedom from that kind of conditioning, with strong institutions, as far as possible impervious to pressure lobbying religious, guaranteeing equality and freedom of individual citizens. Paradoxically, in the interests of religions and ideologies (and that's why the battle for secularism - secularism for them-should also be taken up by believers, at least those 'reasonable'), which free space may continue to exist without the risk that one may take precedence over the others. Certainly not in the interest of the non-believer and a citizen would like to stay with their freedom intact, and sees the danger in the push-all of those who 'opposed to those who seek the alliance of absolutism, believed to be able to defend against extremism using Another extreme, albeit of a different kind, until the inevitable crash or-at best-suppression of their civil rights in the name of a covenant or a war between the cruel and perverse. We're hunting
between two fires: it is a real risk, and must be addressed and averted until we have time. But instead

in Playland as always-think-that no one notices. Calm, nothing happened.

0 comments:

Post a Comment